Learning the link between CN: My Two Cents

So guys this is another new post by me on the learning as a link between Chandra and Nandini. I know that no emperor in history could have been so liberal and humble like Chandra is to Nandini. He carries books back and forth for her like a librarian. Historically impossible and also improbable.

I AGREE WITHH YOU SHAILAJA.

Hi;
My two cents here are soon nandini will start ranting pati Maharaj instead of pita Maharaj.
Chandra in my view is feeling sympathy not because of nandini being victim of revenge but he is viewing her so a girl who has lost everything in a very short period of time
Chandra knows what deprivation means...the loss of loved ones the way he lost his foster mothers love... The way his identity was reduced to dust despite of being capable he was ridiculed as charwahe Ka Beta..
This way the leads are being connected by the thread of empathy... With each other.
Chandra is making nandini rational and I hope on this gurukul tour nandini realizes the Sorry state of affairs in magadh.
On the other hand chandra is venturing into a new territory... He's exploring woman on his own for the first time.
Durdhara was and is his friend cum partner.
Here nandini intrigues.. Irks and fascinates him.
Chandra is taking baby steps towards her but he knows that soon all will be lost when he kills Mahapadmanand...
I'm enjoying this as of now..

Shailaja and stuti
Perhaps they are cutting the cost of a librarian... And now leaving whole magadh and most importantly searching nand chandra is scooting to taxila with Nandni.. But a small thing women's position was very good in vedic era they were allowed to be educated but that declined in maury an age... And even before it... But I'm taking it with a pinch of salt.

Stuti I agree with what Pakiv has said. Education for women was always a very tricky proposition when we go into history. There was always a wide gap between those women who were lucky enough and got the opportunity to be educated and empowered and those who were not. Even those who were considered very educated and knowledgable among the ladies might have had to face tremendous odds. Of course we have never been told those stories of how these ladies came to all that education, knowledge and wisdom. It was not general or universal as it is these days by any standards during the Mauryan Era.

Originally posted by: shailusri1983

Stuti I agree with what Pakiv has said. Education for women was always a very tricky proposition when we go into history. There was always a wide gap between those women who were lucky enough and got the opportunity to be educated and empowered and those who were not. Even those who were considered very educated and knowledgable among the ladies might have had to face tremendous odds. Of course we have never been told those stories of how these ladies came to all that education, knowledge and wisdom. It was not general or universal as it is these days by any standards during the Mauryan Era.

Even these days, there is often a bench mark in the education of women. Many parents often think it is enough if they get a girl graduated and then married while for a son they would have him do his MBA or post graduation as well. I remember many of my friends who though being very talented never did their post graduation or went on to do their M. Tech, M. Phil or Ph. D. They got married and bore children. But when they were studying with me, they had many more dreams and aspirations than just marriage and children.

There might have been Seminaries for Women during Mauryan Era but it would have been more on the lines of our present day Home Science Classes. A bit of music, dance, sewing, cooking, managing the house, a bit of arithmetic for looking after the household expenses, a bit of conversational skills and using feminine charms, not at all interesting by any standards and not at all equal to the kind of education and interesting areas of study to which men had access to.

The professors who were teaching them would not be of the caliber of Acharya Chanakya or Amatya Rakshas. It would be more of our present day uninspiring and bimbo clones of Aunt Agatha and Miss Marplewood parading and strutting about as teachers and professors. They would hardly have appealed to any of the lady learners. They would rather they remained uneducated and untampered by these imposing and frightening ladies.

Originally posted by: shailusri1983

Stuti I agree with what Pakiv has said. Education for women was always a very tricky proposition when we go into history. There was always a wide gap between the between those women who were lucky enough and got the opportunity to be educated and empowered and those who were not. Even those who were considered very educated and knowledgable among the ladies might have had to face tremendous odds. Of course we have never been told those stories of how these ladies came to all that education, knowledge and wisdom. It was not general or universal as it is these days by any standards during the Mauryan Era.

Even these days, there is often a bench mark in the education of women. Many parents often think it is enough if they get a girl graduated and then married while for a son they would have him do his MBA or post graduation as well. I remember many of my friends who though being very talented never did their post graduation or went on to do their M. Tech, M. Phil or Ph. D. They got married and bore children. But when they were studying with me, they had many more dreams and aspirations than just marriage and children.

There might have been Seminaries for Women during Mauryan Era but it would have been more on the lines of our present day Home Science Classes. A bit of music, dance, sewing, cooking, managing the house, a bit of arithmetic for looking after the household expenses, a bit of conversational skills and using feminine charms, not at all interesting by any standards and not at all equal to the kind of education and interesting areas of study to which men had access to.

The professors who were teaching them would not be of the caliber of Acharya Chanakya or Amatya Rakshas. It would be more of our present day uninspiring and bimbo clones of Aunt Agatha and Miss Marplewood parading and strutting about as teachers and professors. They would hardly have appealed to any of the lady learners. They would rather they remained uneducated and untampered by these imposing and frightening ladies.

beautiful Shailaja.
And yes I agree till present a woman who is highly educated is sometimes ridiculed for being a woman... At many places this is toxic
Thts why this track is realistic and it is a good deviation from kitchen politics and chanakya chandra scenes.
Nandini is just an example chandra wants to set before his acharya to make a rule for woman education.
To recall one of the earliest scenes where nandini used to do charity we can decide that she too feels for people the same way as chandra.
This common thinking for magadh will make them click and she will start giving regards to chandra after this track.
I hope so... But I have one koschan..
Can't we have chandra nandini scenes or other scenes beyond the palace Hall... That snan griha and nandinis room...
Atleast they can afford a garden.. Or lawn 😆

Originally posted by: pakhiv

beautiful Shailaja.
And yes I agree till present a woman who is highly educated is sometimes ridiculed for being a woman... At many places this is toxic
Thts why this track is realistic and it is a good deviation from kitchen politics and chanakya chandra scenes.
Nandini is just an example chandra wants to set before his acharya to make a rule for woman education.
To recall one of the earliest scenes where nandini used to do charity we can decide that she too feels for people the same way as chandra.
This common thinking for magadh will make them click and she will start giving regards to chandra after this track.
I hope so... But I have one koschan..
Can't we have chandra nandini scenes or other scenes beyond the palace Hall... That snan griha and nandinis room...
Atleast they can afford a garden.. Or lawn 😆

g