OH quite confused...
we are elaborately discussing on the brought up of Chandra by a monk Acharya Chanakya..about his innocence and his shyness to deal with women and so forth
When he takes bath Helena comes there, he feels extremely shy and tries to hide his body with his hands to safe guard his chastity.
But suddenly he becomes a male chauvinist ...ties Nandini,rolls over her,tears off her duppatta and took her to bath violently and there disrobes her
Why the transformation from a naive innocent personality to villainism .
Let us not forget that it is a hate-love story.So the director had done much home work by going thru a number of "Mills and Boon" novels..where usually the hero will molest the heroine and eventually disappear
There is a hue and cry from the fans..and we can hear them shouting "Rajat why are you doing this dishonourable act,violating the principle of justice"
So it is not Chandra but Rajat???
why the consistent inconsistency?
THE REASON IS
Rajat is a great actor who is so convincing in a role that he can hold an audience captive and make them feel as if there is nothing but his presence is there. and has true commitment.
Ms Ekta has taken the epic banner of Chandra Gupta Maurya to narrate a love story on a grand scale. Let the HISTORY take rest!!!
.
Edited by siva06 - 8 years ago