too much negetivity - rashi instead of Gaura

Page

RaJiforever2

@RaJiforever2

Explorer

Posted: 8 years ago

There r too much negetivity in the show ..if one negetive character leaves then they introduce a new negetive character . Why do we need nso much negetivity in the show . we r tired of watching so much negetivity ., it is OK if they have like characters doing minor kalakaris like How urmi and rashi used to do but bringing gaura back is pointless. We need a break from that character again Gaura-Kokila-And Gaura -meera torture . Why cant they think of somethiposetive lkke brininrashis character back ., if rucha isnt ready to play the character then they shuld bring a new actor who culd play that role.. they will gain lot of trps ..

Quote

Frequent Posters

kavita

@kavitha_r

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

Yes,that is what I hve been saying for the past 2 years that if Rucha does not come back,cv's should find a replacement for her. But they have not done it till now.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

MADHYAMAVATHI

@MADHYAMAVATHI

Explorer

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: katrinasalman
Yes,that is what I hve been saying for the past 2 years that if Rucha does not come back,cv's should find a replacement for her. But they have not done it till now.

How can they bring back a dead character after 20 or so years.

What will be the position of Paridhi if Rashi comes back.

Actually, whatever characters are brought the show has become too old.

It needs to end on a positive note.

In fact most of the characters introduced after Rashi's death are meaningless.

They are just extending the story line for the sake of it.

Quote

RaJiforever2

@RaJiforever2

Explorer

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: MADHYAMAVATHI

How can they bring back a dead character after 20 or so years.

What will be the position of Paridhi if Rashi comes back.

Actually, whatever characters are brought the show has become too old.

It needs to end on a positive note.

In fact most of the characters introduced after Rashi's death are meaningless.

They are just extending the story line for the sake of it.

everything is possible in Saathiya . like look at the current track .. in like so many years they have never mentoined urvashi or jaggi and suddenly they stepped into the modi bhavan .cvs dont need any logic ti show rashis character caz they haven't used logic or any common snense in any of their track . They culd do so many things with Paridhis character .. the cvs is not even giving her enough screenspace . and they need rashi if they want more trpas and audience. And yea thats right all the characters that was introcduces after rashi's death are pointless. What was the point of bringing Monika ,sona ,Naiya , Shravan into sns . Naiya and prakash get more screenspace than Shravan. he only seats there and takes priyal to school thats his only job . 😆

Quote

MADHYAMAVATHI

@MADHYAMAVATHI

Explorer

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: RaJiforever2

everything is possible in Saathiya . like look at the current track .. in like so many years they have never mentoined urvashi or jaggi and suddenly they stepped into the modi bhavan .cvs dont need any logic ti show rashis character caz they haven't used logic or any common snense in any of their track . They culd do so many things with Paridhis character .. the cvs is not even giving her enough screenspace . and they need rashi if they want more trpas and audience. And yea thats right all the characters that was introcduces after rashi's death are pointless. What was the point of bringing Monika ,sona ,Naiya , Shravan into sns . Naiya and prakash get more screenspace than Shravan. he only seats there and takes priyal to school thats his only job .😆

If it was so easy to bring back a dead character, the makers would have brought back Ahem straight instead of creating the character of Jaggi or Urvashi.

And moreover in the case of Rashi, there is a time lapse of nearly two decades. Her absence from the family for such a long period would be very difficult to justify.

Moreover the character of Rashi was shown as dead and cremated. Its not even the case of an accident when the face would be unrecognizable so that there could be a mistake.

Even in the case of Ahem, the face was shown clearly so that there could be no mistake about the identity of the dead person.

Quote

too much negetivity - rashi instead of Gaura

Related Topics

Explore Topics