I have a question. Does Annapurna suffer from some from of memory loss, or something? 😳 No, seriously, how else do you explain her conversation with Laksh? She says that Laksh ko Ragini ko dhoka nahin dena chahiye, and while I agree that "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind", has Annapurna forgotten all the dhoka from her bholi-bhali, sanskaari bahu?
How does she expect Laksh to live the rest of his life with a woman who manipulated him into marriage, attempted to kill the girl he loved, humiliated his family, and blackmailed them into giving her their property and business?
I get it, Ragini wanted Laksh's love, and now, supposedly, since she is receiving this 'love', she's changed. But really, Annapurna? There's no way Ragini can change so quickly, and I personally cannot accept a Ragini who has not properly suffered the consequences for her mistakes. Wait, forget mistakes, it should be sins. Ragini has committed far too many sins and is yet to accept/regret them, so on what basis has she changed? 🤔
What irks me most about this is that Annapurna is convinced that Ragini has changed. 😳 Accha ji, itni jaldi badal gayi? Agar aisa hota, toh sabse pehle Ragini sab property/business wapis karti, aur ghar ki chabiya apni saas ko deti. But has Ragini done any of this yet? No, no she hasn't.
I admit that Ragini seems to be changing...but, I cannot accept her wearing her old clothes, being all sanskaari again, and not wanting to break up SwaSan as her legitimate redemption. First, Ragini needs to accept her sins and repent.
Arre yaara, ek toh yeh "Jiji khush nahin hain" tape recorder bardaasht nahin hoti, upar se yeh Kavita. Aur phir SwaSan ek dusre ke saath teek se communicate nahin kar rahe hain. Yeh sab kafi nahin tha kya?
I used to think Ragini was the most delusional character, but ab toh lagta hain ke Annapurna hi hain.