i5hy thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#1
the marks prachi desai, mini mathur and tapur chaterjee got were less compared to the others. if u had looked closely u could hav seen that after mini's performance the marks started increasing n thats because rohit pointed out that despite praising heartily the judges arent giving good marks 😲 this made them give more to the others who came after that sandya , sudha. not fair to prachi who was enjoying her dance n she was dancing from the heart. it was obvious. i think she should hav been given more 😛 if her dance had been a little later in the show she must hav gotton more marks.
tonights ladke wil get more marks cox the judges hav now only realised how less they r giving to the contestants
v hav to vote for our prachi, mini and tapur n save them ASAP 😛

Created

Last reply

Replies

8

Views

717

Users

9

Frequent Posters

raunaq thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#2
i dont agree with prachi, sonali, mini and one more contestant. they were all good but some how they lacked the spark. sandhya was very good, the chemistry was shining through them. all the contestants were technically good but sandhya and sudha beat others 😛 sandhyas mehbooba was just sizzling.
Edited by raunaq - 17 years ago
raj5000 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: raunaq

i dont agree with prachi, sonali, mini and one more contestant. they were all good but some how they lacked the spark. sandhya was very good, the chemistry was shining through them. all the contestants were technically good but sandhya and sudha beat others 😛 sandhyas mehbooba was just sizzling.

I agree, thier trainers need to get a boom alarm😆

cheeky_angel thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: raunaq

i dont agree with prachi, sonali, mini and one more contestant. they were all good but some how they lacked the spark. sandhya was very good, the chemistry was shining through them. all the contestants were technically good but sandhya and sudha beat others 😛 sandhyas mehbooba was just sizzling.

I agree 😃 overall i think Sudha waz gr8!

addyydda thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#5
sandhya mridul def deserved the high marks she got....she danced well n had lotz of energy...it was a fun perf....i thoroughly njoyed it

infact i think most of them did well considering they were dancin 4 the 1st tym on stage...
👏 👏
NYC_gurl_17 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#6
yea prachi deserved way more
Tatoo Lady thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#7
I think in the begining the judges didn't want to give more marks. They didn't have anyone to compare with. If they gave the first contestant 8 or 9, what would do they do if some one performed much much better than this one?
sia<3 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#8
sandhya wass juss greatt her dancee wass juss fablouss and yeaa prachi did deserve moreeee her wass greatt too. 👏
kubare thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 17 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: raunaq

i dont agree with prachi, sonali, mini and one more contestant. they were all good but some how they lacked the spark. sandhya was very good, the chemistry was shining through them. all the contestants were technically good but sandhya and sudha beat others 😛 sandhyas mehbooba was just sizzling.

Completely agree...Sandhya...sparkled in her dance...she was fantastic....and so was Sudha.....👏

So I think the marks were fair......the rest need to improve adn buck up....

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".