Mussarat, why VS cut 1 point? - Page 3

Originally posted by: a406a4

Mussarat didn't deserve 10, don't get me wrong, Mussarat is a fantastic singer with a good range, but he's terrible on the low notes.

Yeah, i too feel the same....just because he sings a classical number doesn't mean he should be given 10..he goes besura at low notes most of the time..VS were fair in not giving him 10...

Originally posted by: Subclavian110

mussarat is going to make it big because himesh needs a singer like him. Realize mussarat chances with himesh are ten fold better than vineet because vineet did not have anything unique about his singing like mussarat has.

I couldn't have agreed more... Vineet does not have a very unique sort of voice. He sounds very much like Sonu and so does Aneek. Why would anyone take them when they have an established and experienced singer like Sonu available.

Originally posted by: Subclavian110

its quite evident the way himesh always acts during a mussarat performance that he likes him a lot. I think mussarat is himesh's favorite, and definitely someone who he'll (himesh) benefit off of

You both are so true...

Originally posted by: miss_canada

That bald guy just have a problem with Mussarrat...His comment on saying that his performance was a bit lower than last time was just simply stupid! Someone tell me, r they giving marks on the current performance or their past performanes?? 😕 😕 😕
Y was he comparing his current performance with his last performance?? U r suppose to take points off ONLY if something in THIS performance was wrong, and there was none, otherwise he would have said it!!

Don't be stupid... they really should compare the current performance of the singer to his past ones. It's about potential & growth. Yes, they have to consider external factors such as type of song, but they should definitely compare. It's not like Math class where you get what you get. Singing isn't objective.

What would you rather them do? Compare one person's singing to another person's singing? Besides, when you watch someone grow and learn in a field you dedicate your life to (i.e. singing), you can't help but instruct and compare.

I would've given him a 9 as well. I would rarely give a 10, because 10's are saved for only outstanding-- truly magnificent-- unmatchable performances.

Originally posted by: WittyTwit

I would've given him a 9 as well. I would rarely give a 10, because 10's are saved for only outstanding-- truly magnificent-- unmatchable performances.

Yeah I can see how other judges are giving out tens to other non-deserving singers😭😡

Anyways,Mussarat is safe!👏

Originally posted by: Subclavian110

but mussarat received the full 30~

😕 No he didn't VS cut 1 point so he had 29. They shouldn't have he was flawless