Going beyond the films when one engages in the very same titillation with the way one dresses for fashion shoots or even offscreen (neither for a movie or a shoot) on many occasions one is once again relying on the same commercial interests one is relying on the very same logic. Again, one keeps the audience interest alive by providing that very same skin show if you will. A woman of course has the right to dress as she likes but if she willingly submits herself to a sexualized paradigm as and when it suits her one can hardly complain that something revolutionary has happened with the TOI picture. And this is not like someone dressing this way as a non-celebrity. Because that is simply a lifestyle choice with no commercial motive to it. But here TOI has a commercial interest as does Deepika. Today even men do the same with 6 packs and what not. Again they participate in the same paradigm. Either way it the actor's choice. This is not what I'm criticizing. But you can't suddenly pretend that TOI is not respecting women' when you do the very same in film after film from exposure of the body to titillating lines (that latest Bhansali film with innuendo-laden lines about the girl pulling the boy's trigger'.. yes yes I know, it's all about what the character' demands!).
But let's expand the conversation a bit more. Wasn't this the same Deepika who talked about Ranbir in some very tasteless ways on Johar's show as she and Sonam giggled about his anatomy (I am being euphemistic) or talked about other let's say preferences' of his in bed? Wasn't this even worse than the images?
All of this still does not mean that what TOI did was right but allow me to raise my eyebrows at the storm Deepika has generated over this and the holier-than-thou attitude with which many of her peers have follow ('hey who's disrespecting women?'! Yeah right!).
12