Suman

I am thoroughly confused. I thought suman knew saurabh was wrong but was supporting him out of a sense of blind loyalty.

I think CVs changed track. If Saurabh's mom is shown to be doing all this knowingly, then it will be long route till they get solution. I think CVs wanted to cut short it. That's why CVs made sanchi ask saurabh if she knew all of it and saurabh said only a little, which is quite unconvincing for me or I missed something.

If it was in the interest of cutting this storyline short, then I'm all for suman's act of ignorance 🤣🤣

CVs show certain things as per their track convenience. I used watch one serial where the Hero knew from the 1st week of the show started itself that he was adopted child. But later after six months or so, he was made shouting about ppl hiding it from him😆. Whole identity crisis drama was played out😆. I even checked the specific episode back and confirmed. Maybe CVs memory is very bad and viewer's memory is not.

Originally posted by: Sunna_Deewani

I think CVs changed track. If Saurabh's mom is shown to be doing all this knowingly, then it will be long route till they get solution. I think CVs wanted to cut short it. That's why CVs made sanchi ask saurabh if she knew all of it and saurabh said only a little, which is quite unconvincing for me or I missed something.

subah i don't think they changed track. i was thinking during all this that Suman doesn't know that saurabh is really a bad & done wrong. bcoz she always used 2 say 2 sanchi that she framed sau . tho i don't know wen in court judge saw that vid clip & then gave judgement,how can she believe that sau is innocent??😕may b she didn't see the clip & thot its a fabricated vid like many ppl do.

Originally posted by: tiny15

subah i don't think they changed track. i was thinking during all this that Suman doesn't know that saurabh is really a bad & done wrong. bcoz she always used 2 say 2 sanchi that she framed sau . tho i don't know wen in court judge saw that vid clip & then gave judgement,how can she believe that sau is innocent??😕may b she didn't see the clip & thot its a fabricated vid like many ppl do.

CV's were right. Even vivek thought rape case was framed by Sanchi to trap Saurab at initial stage until he saw the mms made by his brother. Being mother element of love will even deep the belief that Sanchi is wrong and not her son. Suman might have misbehaved to her just to create rift between sanchi&vivek but not on the cost of woman's reputation. She confessed her mistakes as well. so far good. Big drama is likely to come at BH jaister.

Okay ... so what was the message of this track and what was the audience?

Originally posted by: Sunna_Deewani

Honestly I have not watched sanchi track with that much concentration. I could be wrong. But i always felt like she knew and still supported him. In real life too ppl may support in front of others and scold them in private just to save family prestige etc.

And What was all that framing and misbehaving with sanchi, the terrance one and so many others - is that all innocent acts for Saurabh's mom😕. How come she doesn't know how his son got convicted! Was she is the court or not, I don't remember.

i also didn't watch sau-sa track much esply after sa mrg.but wen sau was in jail & after sa mrg he came back he made her believe that hes innocent .i conclude this from the r convos & thatswhy she allowed him 2 misbehave wid sa so that sa can b insulted.

I think they have cut short this track.
Suman Kabra did believe that Sanchi had consensual sex and framed him for rape.
I thought something will happen to Rakhi Kabra and that's how both mother and son realise.
But any way they cut short this track.

Don't know what message they intended give through this track

It made only sense till Sanchi's marriage.
Probably after that they wanted to bring about change in Suman Kabra and they did it in a rather convoluted and unconvincing way.

I think this is one of the worst tracks that have been shown in BV.