Posted:
Hi...am loving all your reviews. It is very refreshing to pop in here and read objective viewpoints
To add my two penny bits:
- The inconsistency in JM's characterisation is her 'superior' attitude towards Raja's family. yes, she does'nt like them , does'nt agree with them. But just being decent to them is in her nature. Unless, as a plot, they do not want any softening of either the family nor Madhu towards each other, and that seems to be more the reason. But TRP viewers will definitely not like it. I said so in my EDT review, I was giggling when she said, aapki galti ke liye maaf kiya. It's different from the regular soap heroine who is always trying to please her husband's family, regardless of being treated badly.
- ALso, the reason why JM was quiet after her marriage was because she knew AK would hurt Raju to hurt her, and that was what kept her quiet. Even then, she did try to leave him in a safe place with Meenakshi. That situation to me, is not a reference point.
- Once again, we have to remember is that she refused to wear the sindoor and mangalsutra after marrying Raju because she did not accept the marriage. So Jm is the type who does not do what she does not believe in.
- Her caving in to Leelawati was uncharactetistic of her ..am curious to see how she will handle her tomorrow.
- The pace between Rajbala is fine. So far, Raja has not shown a softer side to him, the side that Raju displayed. We need a slow pace so that their love story is believable. I used to feel terrible when people would say that Rishbala had nothing except a physical attraction. They also had unconditional love, and acceptance of each other, is what I felt. Anyway, I don't want to get into the trap of comparing the two couples.
The absolute worst thing to do is to compare Rajbala to Rishbala.
