Paro's innocence or lack thereof has absolutely nothing to do with what she said. Her dialogues only conveyed what she thought was right, that is,
Mala didn't know of Tejawat's misdoings when she fell in love with him. It does not say,
that she is okay with the fact that Mala ran away, leaving being a husband and a son. And the fact that any woman had come to the verge of leaving behind her husband for another man, and walking out of a marriage in which they shared a son will have
substantial reasons - which haven't yet been unravelled in the current storyline. Paro, merely wanted to correct the notion planted in Rudra's head that she went ahead, and readily, knowingly fell in love with Tejawat.
I would also like to add that the creative directors of this story have a certain story-line in their mind. They also have a vision for their characters which might be of pure, unadulterated goodness or a flawed personality. You cannot expect a fictional story to be told, and judge every action / every line a character might say based upon your whimsies. Paro's character is not dumb - its practical and in alignment with her character's personality. She always believes in the fact that there will be some light even in the darkest of times. She believes, like a any sensible person would do that if she took such a major, drastic decision that turned her life around - then there must have been a reason. And since bearing the brunt of Mala's actions, is Rudra - he cannot be blamed to think logically. So if, Paro pointed out the obvious - what wrong did she do? And even if there is no reason behind Mala's decision - it is a fictional, creative narrative - let it unfold, let it play out before passing judgements and damnations.
Edited by mistyrains - 11 years ago