How is that justified??? - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

20

Views

2.2k

Users

12

Likes

44

Frequent Posters

Yuvika_15 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#21

Originally posted by: togepe30

I agree,...it was beyond ridiculous...

They were also saying..she won coz she is Usman is beti...and Usman also said shez his beti..

Watz with the aukaat...And hello...its unfair to give her 51% property...Zain and Fahad actually WORK with the group...wat does she do? IDIOT...

All three should get equal importance...why should any one of them get the bigger chunk? I wouldve said this even if Usman handed 51% to Zain or Fahad...wat crime have the other 2 done...DOWNRIGHT MEAN !

lol if anything fahad should get more becos he's been working with his dad 4 yrs, zain's only just begun.
to be fair it should be divided equally among the children but till suraiya and usman r alive and well it should remain in their own name. I don't get how putting 51% on barkat's name will make her "something" ppl will still say she's just got tht becos she's usman's daughter... the point they were saying is tht she hasn't proved her worth and by putting 51% property on her name jus like tht its not like usman's proven she's worth it... u have to earn it... I guess they just wanted to somehow show the property being transferred to barkat's name...it would have made more sense if they showed tht when usman built the empire he had there n then put 51% of his property on barkat's name.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".