Posted:
I don't necessarily think that women lose their identity by changing their names after marriage. Now a days most women have a choice in the matter and many still choose to go with their husband's name, because they want to add to their identity, not really take away from it. Now that being said, I totally get where you're coming from. There are many hypocrites who will say that women should always change their names after marriage and husbands shouldn't. In this day and age, I think it should be up to the couple whether or not they want to change or add any names or not.Now in THIS case, I just brought this up because I thought it was funny that Sameer/Aditya had no identity of himself. He's not only mooching off of the Jagganath's daulat shaulat, but also using their name. If it was shown that Aditya had changed his last name to Jagannath because he actually wanted to add his wife's identity to his own identity (regardless of her wealth, then it wouldn't be as big of a deal. BUT that isn't the case at all...😆
if you say a woman doesn't lose her identity when she changes her surname, in some cases even the name and has to go around telling people her new identity, then how does Adi not have his own identity for taking the jagannath surname? is it bcoz we don't know wht his surname was before marriage?
critics can say that for women too who live on their husband's money, that they take the husbands' surname and use his money in return for cooking him food
and I didn't mean you when I said hypocrites. it is just in general that when a woman does these things, we take it for granted. but when a man does stuff, we all jump up and make fun of him.
Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2
Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki
