Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000
He never raped Gauri; there is a huge difference. He was never a leech in that respect. I do not count the two as the same. While he wanted to marry her, he never was written or presented as one who would take advantage of her. What he did was wrong, but he was no Raunaq. Gauri died; Soham never married her and the children are not Gauri's; these children are the children of another woman and her sister who married Soham and these marriages consensual. Gauri was never a rape victim and the way this story was written, we were never given the impression that Gauri would be raped by Soham; Soham wanted her love which is very different from what Raunaq wanted from Mansi. Soham protected Gauri when the time arose; he did what he could for her and vice versa - a whole other relationship than what we see with Raunaq. Soham is free and his wrongdoing is in attempting to kidnap Gauri.
Lets agree to disagree about Sohum the saint . Who has whitened himself by beaiting Raunaq . Even Ajit the rapist was free in PR , Being free is no character certificate . Even if he did not marry Gauri , the other woman he married has FLED from the monster , so much so that even the kids could not hold her back . Gauri's life was spoilt by this same obsessive pursuing and that is love ? In PR prior to Raunaq there r 3 men who were the source of misery to women ...Ajit the rapist who spoilt Vandu's life , Sohum who spoilt 2 women's life and Damodar who did not rape but submerged himself freely in alcoholism and worked occasionally not as a responsibility but as a hobby ...so much so that 16 year old Manav had to shoulder the whole responsibility . Savita may be many things but she has suffered on this level .
And Kinnary is smiling ? She deserves two resounding ones on her thobda for purposefully going there the next morning and snickering at Manasi .
Bigg Boss 19
