EDT : Post your views/Discuss HERE Wrng Pg.76/105

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Hillylove

@Hillylove

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#71

Originally posted by: Dabulls23
Hi Hillydee
Agree with your post on EK article abt people lookng younger..

OK by the same logic EK in her late 20s or early 30s why does she not look better than 50+ yrs young looking Archana??????

Pls CVs or EK answer me this Q...I saw pic of EK in rikshaw with maroon color strepless dress...I am not bashing her at all...WIth all the money she has why not get veneers for her teeth, work out to look her age...Dress approprite to look fine...There are subtle changes she herself can make to look better...This is constructive feedback to her article...Not bashing EK at all...

OMG, WE are BAD people🤣 I was thinking the same thing when I saw her Pic in the article, I was 😲, that was Queen B, Ekta??? Well, maybe we are expecting too much from her then 😆

Quote

koolsadhu1000

@koolsadhu1000

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

#72

Sulo, the FOUNDER, PREACHER AND AUTHOR OF 70 LAKHS WORTH of VICTIM COMPLEX MOTIVATIONAL SPEAKING!!!😡

😆😆😆

Savita hates Archana but Savita's family has LOST due to the Karanjkars ...Sachin , miscarried baby , Soham , Manav's izzat , MONEY [ A huge Huge CHUNK of it }

Sulo hates Manav ...for WHAT ? 😆😆😆 For GAINING 70 Lakhs in a span of 5 years so she can comfortably live in that house although she does not earn a dime ? Marrried daughter is now living with her and bearing her expenses , thanks to her teachings which broke married daughters marraige . It is all very well to get bugged with son in law , but daughter only filed case against son in law and later supported her psychotic sister and lost their son !

So WHAT is Sulo angry about ?She shud be thankful that son in law did not demand each rupee from that 70 lakhs back before going to Canada saying I have3 children to raise . Dharmesh wud have done that .

Btw WHAT has happened to dear old Evil Batat Dharmu ?😉

The Evil Dear is not to bee seen with his sulky pout as each of his evil schemes FAILED . I wish we had seen MORE interaction between Sulo and THIS damad .

Guys m itching to comment but SUCH a busy day .

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

suan

@suan

Rocker

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

#73

Re older people looking younger article, Ekta said that actors like SRK and Salman Khan look young for their age, so she doesn't see why there should be a problem for young actors (in their 20's), to play a character in their 40's.

Ekta doesn't seem to realise that though these two actors do look very good for their age, at least they look like they are in their 40's...we can't say the same for Archana! She still looks like she's in her 20's!

Edited by suan - 13 years ago

Quote

Dabulls23

@Dabulls23

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

#74

Mind you these 2 men SRK and Sallu both have regular life with women...SRK with Gauri and Sallu oh well with Aish, Katrina ETC

Archu has 6 yrs of marriage and 20 yrs of celibacy does not make a woman look younger @ 50...I know so...My dad died when my mom was only 25 with 8 yrs of marriage only and 4 kids and 1 born 20 days after my dad passed on...I know what woman's body goes thru..Here Archana after 4 pregnancy and now 50 looks gorgeous not a day older than she was preleap...May be looks even younger...

I dont mean to get so candid but Archana looking like 27 @ 50 is impossible...

SRK does look his age and bit more...His body is fine but his face gives away his age...So all this hogwash does not make sense to MOI and intelligent brain..

Quote

suan

@suan

Rocker

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

#75

Exactly Varsha. That's why I said it is unbelievable how Sulochana and Archana look post leap. No woman remains the same after 18 years, no matter what kind of life you've lead.

As you said, SRK's face indiacates his age. When his co star is young (like Anushka Sharma), you see the difference. No way can Ankita be in her 40's and Sulochana be in her 70's, the way they looked in today's episode!

Quote

koolsadhu1000

@koolsadhu1000

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

#76

Originally posted by: suan
Exactly Varsha. That's why I said it is unbelievable how Sulochana and Archana look post leap. No woman remains the same after 18 years, no matter what kind of life you've lead.

As you said, SRK's face indiacates his age. When his co star is young (like Anushka Sharma), you see the difference. No way can Ankita be in her 40's and Sulochana be in her 70's, the way they looked in today's episode!

Infact was it my fancy or did Sulo look younger😆😆

I think they have overdone it in showing that aged people can also look beautiful and glamorous as is the popular IN THING thought nowdays . If they had shown SOMETHING to denote Archana's age ...ONE streak of grey hair , or perhaps a sligtly modified hair style if the hair is not grey [ a more mature ponytail or a bun at the nape ] Or at least specs ...SOMETHING . She wud have STILL looked beautiful ...in my eyes , beauty does NOT diminish with age . It acquires more and more GRACE . How u etch that graceful aspect is the work of the make up artist . One must not be so silly to show a 50 year old like a 26 year old or to show a 50 yr old like an old stressed out and haggardly . Both the extremes need to be avoided . Simi Garewal , Rekha , Hema , r examples of gorgeous 50 and 60 year olds .

Quote

Dabulls23

@Dabulls23

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

#77

DOnt forget SHarmila Tagor...All look beautiful and have aged so gracefully...

Quote

koolsadhu1000

@koolsadhu1000

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

#78

Yes even Sharmila . So lovely . Some of the Western actresses too look SO FAB as they age . It NEVER matters to me about being scared if my fav idol is asked to play an older role . I mean ...so WHAT ? All know the real age , and its only the role demanding it briefly . Besides , pne can look really STUNNINg . One can experiment with hair , show a bob , specs , a different get up .

Quote

suan

@suan

Rocker

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

#79

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

Infact was it my fancy or did Sulo look younger😆😆

I think they have overdone it in showing that aged people can also look beautiful and glamorous as is the popular IN THING thought nowdays . If they had shown SOMETHING to denote Archana's age ...ONE streak of grey hair , or perhaps a sligtly modified hair style if the hair is not grey [ a more mature ponytail or a bun at the nape ] Or at least specs ...SOMETHING . She wud have STILL looked beautiful ...in my eyes , beauty does NOT diminish with age . It acquires more and more GRACE . How u etch that graceful aspect is the work of the make up artist . One must not be so silly to show a 50 year old like a 26 year old or to show a 50 yr old like an old stressed out and haggardly . Both the extremes need to be avoided . Simi Garewal , Rekha , Hema , r examples of gorgeous 50 and 60 year olds .

Absolutely agree with you Kools, and by the way, a warm hello from me.🤗

I haven't been in touch with you here for a few days.

I too think Hema is an amazingly beautiful lady. I don't know her age or the films she acted in, but have seen her at award shows and other functions, and she always looks so young and graceful!

The Cv's do need to be realistic with the age of the characters. This is a problem with them throughout the show. They don't keep track of what has happened in the show and we see alot of gaffes occuring. Don't know where Ekta gets her staff from.