Kool's Commentary : Jan 20 PR - Page 19

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

U know I remember u when I watch Pratigya coz Sajjan Singh .Pratigyas sasur wears same exotic Kurtas like Vishwasrao . Turqoise blue , a resplendent purple , a striking maroon . Ohhh my .

Originally posted by: toothbrush13

I've seen Sajjan Singh's kurtas too, but effect of the bright kurtas with the shining, smooth head and trimmed moustache was something different altogether, haiyye what a man he was, that Vishwasrao! 😍😆

And I know you will deliver on your promise and do a swell job!

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

Little ones r already in bed .Their bro tucks them in every nite , they dont like us , the parents tucking em in .Its their bhaiyya they want . They sleep taking his kiss as the last kiss on their cheek . Always . . Regarding Savita and Jaywant ............yup she went there to see tamasha . But the moment her son was targeted she rose to his defence . . Why she didnt tell Manav ?😆 Why wud she she , is she silly ? Her goal is to get that Archna out of his life ! Jay had promised her that , she was in her own way using Jay to get Archu out of Manavs life , she is desperate to get Archna KARANJKAR out of her life ! The mother in her protected HER SON but the saas in her didnt reveal all to him coz she wants Archu out ! . Savita is very very consistent and clear ...............She WANTS Manav , she DOESNT WANT Archana . . But Sulo has no such goal , rite ? She toh LOVES Manav na ?😉 Then why the silence when he was framed for theft or humiliated as WAITER ? In Savitas words .muh mein taala kyu laga tha ? . Answer : She doesnt love Manav AT ALL . Its all fake , just so she can keep relations with her daughter . She knows her daughter is crazy abt him and may break off with her . . Savita isnt fake , she doesnt love Archna and she makes no bones about it .

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

The difference between Bhavnas grief over loss of grandson and SAvitas is that attachment is stronger in SAvitas case as her son lived for around 25 years . If Bhavna feels so much pain for a child not even from her womb , and unborn ......imagine SAvitas grief over someone she reared and lived with .

Originally posted by: Tanyaz

Sulochna also has only one goal and that is Archana and her happiness.If she is nice to Manav right now it is only because of her daughetr .Tomorrow if Manav is bad to Archana then Sulochna will hate him again ...Sulos goal is Archna and her happiness ? Not Punni and Manju ? Then why did she do her bit in doing satyanash of Archus life ?😆😆😆😆 This is news to me . Till yesterday she was CONSISTENT in her goal ....being CAREFUL not to take Archus side publicly and hurt Manjus feelings ! What was that silence about if Archna is her goal ?

Savita too loves her son but I think riht now her hatred for Archana is more than her love for Manav .Just because she is not a fake and just wants to remove Archana Deshmukh out of his life ( his legally weded wife ) does not excuses her of wrong doings ....

In my view she should have immediately told Manav there tha tJaywan twanted me there for a dhamaka or tell him later so that he is careful of this potentialy dangerous enemy .......

By knowing somewhat about the conspiracy and even later keeping quiet about it ... is terrible because that was a conspiracy against Manav .Although Im defending her I admit its wrong . But then she has kept quiet abt Manju too till now .Both Manju Jay promised her Archna wud be OUT of Manavs life .

If currently Manav and Sulochna are getting along then good, I am not going to be angry because of that ...Manav will always have a soft spot for her because this is the woman who gave him Archana , the best thing that ever happened to him ( that's according to him , not me ) , 3 thapds or whatever ... he is thankful to her for this .....Archna is the best thing that happened to manav ?

😆😆😆😆😆My dear on a realistic level if SATYANASH is supposed to be the best thing that happened to a man ..........then ok I accept this .Coz what is losing a bro , suffering two jailings , beatings , loss of reputation amount to but SATYANASH , ? How can ANY girl in the world who brings this in a man's life INDIRECTLY TOO , can be GOOD for him or the BEST THING to happen to him ? She has yet to prove herself . A long way to go before she is complimented THUS .

Just like any other human being , manav too should be allowed to live life the way he wants ......He has done enough for his family and his parents and is willing todo so mauch even more , if allowed ...He deserves to be happy with the person whome he wants to be happy with .

That is his choice , like everyone else he should be given the freedom to love the girl he wants to love and not the girl his mother wants him to love and I am happy that now he is following his heart .....that is the best thing to do in life for everyone ...I disagree here .When a man is te only earning member in the family , his choices take a backseat .Archna cannot be more important than old parents or dead brother . Rules for EVERYONE cannot be applied to unique cases and Manav is a unique case .

Archana is also thankful to Savita for giving him Manav , hell she was even thankful to Ajit for creating a problem and thus bringing Manav in her life ..She loves Savita genuinely because she is Manav's mother ..Now if Savita accpets the girl who is her son's love and his choice then I hope they all stay happy together in oen house , it would be nice to see happy Deshmukh family I will be very happy for them and also be happy for savita ...Me too .

But if Savita stays adamnat on her goal of breaking the marriage of a good human being , breaking her son's heart very very badly and breaking a happy home .....then I hope she never succeeds ....Me too .

By the way the episode where Manav is called a manhoos waiter and varsha is screaming that rasika is right .....Savita is first shown that she immediately attacks Archan and then later she is shown to be clapping for varsha in the cake cutting ceremony , even smiling for Varsha .....😕😆

so much so for the direction of that episode ....U have said that many times , I differ here . As I saw it , it was not at all CLAPPING FOR VARSHA as much as it was TAKING THE ANGER OUT ON ARCHANA . Its not so simplistic as CLAPPING FOR VARSHA .

This is it from me ....I think I have said all I wanted to say about Savita ....

Time to hit the bed ...

Originally posted by: vishwap

In my opinion nothing justifies Savita's behaviour ever. The character is being shown as a lady portraying pure selfishness. She can snatch babies, she can send her own husband to jail for simply opposing her and trying to create public tamasha by burning her daughter-in-law. She plotted and schemed for dowry, her son's divorce etc long before Sachin died without ever caring for her son's happiness. She cares for her children in her own way but always places her own self before anyone else, including her own children. I dont agree that manav , Damodar etc do not care for her. Inspite of everything , they try to support her and keep her happy. It is strange that manav is being blamed for neglecting her when she does not allow him to come back home. I do not find her funny at all.

Depends on how u see her character . Frankly if anything and everything in this serial justifies Archus behaviour Savita has a character has far more valid reasons . Archu has walked out on a marraige and commited the sin of breaking a sacred vow , welcomed Shravni with Aarti , then unable to control herself , flirted AFTER Shravni was bethroted to him , then used Jay for pleasing Manavs Sacrificial nonsensenical whims then come running to mandap on the day of Shravnis marraige not giving a thought as to what the hELL IS THIS . I was AGAINST all this .U may not believe this but i wanted Archu Manav NOT to divorce . I see her foolish decisions wrecking lives . And if ALL this nonsense is justifiable , why shudnt a moms grief at losing a son be beats me . Like u said , all have their POV . ALL characters .

If Archana's entry caused problems for savita, then the reverse is also equally true. If Archana brought bad luck for Savita, then Savita also brought a lot of grief and misery for Archana. And it is not as though both of them had a trouble-free life before they came upon each other! But theres a difference . Archna walked into Savitas life as a rishta via Manju thru that door . AND LEFT . Again , after leaving Manav , she once more walked thru that door and left after 3 month stay this time disregarding Savitas request . Then she walked right once more , AGAIN at her whim , on the marraige day and said HEy IM here , Ive REALISED my mistake ..as whimsical as Varsha isnt it ? Meanwhile in the process , Savitas son suffered two jailings due to her sainted family who LOVE her and who Archna LOVES . So my question is .......who told Archna to walk repeatedly in a life where there was Savita who clearly harassed her ? Savita never told her COme in My life did she ? That was Archnas choice !😆😆😆😆

Every character in the story has made mistakes at different points and are paying for them in their own way in different degrees .

The only person who has got away scot-free so far is Manjusha who stands for pure evil!

In real life, we all know that one does not see such drastic changes in personalities over the short time periods shown. However, the various contradictions depicted in this story are so obvious that they seem truly funny, something that the writers have to take blame for.

My POV of, course!