Parichay November 10 - Written Update

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

neeme

@neeme

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: Naz_Angel
its giving me creepy...i cant take the dumbness anymore...i need to find some volunteers soon to help me get rid of this😳😆😉

And If Till Then All Other UPDATERS ask the same.. Then What 😆😆😆 Hehe Dont Think Like this... Lets Hope For The Good..And Say ALL IS WELL,...ALL IS WELL 😉😆

Quote

valleyhouse

@valleyhouse

Explorer

Posted: 13 years ago

#12

Lamrani: Using the trick photography idea in the court for argument was not a cheap shot at all. Yes i agree in this case probably the true and right picture got rejected and also an impt clue got thrashed. Also even if Siddhi took this idea from Kunal itself i dont see her at fault atall. She is opponent lawyer and can and will use any information she gets to defeat the other team. Ofcourse right now she is unaware that Rohit is not innocent (thats my take on this case)..once she will realize she will give up this case. I am hoping this case can get stretched to beyond 3 months from her contract time then she can easily give up her case or simply loose to Kunal as she will be siding the truth then.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

-Rani

@-Rani

Trailblazer

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: Naz_Angel

Quote

-Rani

@-Rani

Trailblazer

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: valleyhouse
Lamrani: Using the trick photography idea in the court for argument was not a cheap shot at all. Yes i agree in this case probably the true and right picture got rejected and also an impt clue got thrashed. Also even if Siddhi took this idea from Kunal itself i dont see her at fault atall. She is opponent lawyer and can and will use any information she gets to defeat the other team. Ofcourse right now she is unaware that Rohit is not innocent (thats my take on this case)..once she will realize she will give up this case. I am hoping this case can get stretched to beyond 3 months from her contract time then she can easily give up her case or simply loose to Kunal as she will be siding the truth then.

I agree with you. Just one thing though, before proving someone's evidence wrong, you have to be certain that they are wrong, otherwise, you are playing with justice. I know she is opponent lawyer, but one should have to think about the justice too. It's not always about proving your opponent wrong, it's should be about what's right what's wrong and she didn't know for sure those photos were trick photography. She should have stopped for a sec and thought what If these photos are true, then is my client really innocent? Ultimately you are fighting for the justice to prevail not to just win and loose.

I guess, I am talking about morals and ethics which doesn't exist these days in the profession of law because of lawyers ambitions to win the case instead of fight for justice. It's very sad na😭.

Edited by Iamrani - 13 years ago

Quote

@-RD-

Stunner

+ 9

Posted: 13 years ago

#15

TY Naz

For the epi I have only one emoticon

Quote

-sahasra-

@-sahasra-

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: Iamrani
I agree with you. Just one thing though,before proving someone's evidence wrong, you have to be certain that they are wrong,👏👏 otherwise, you are playing with justice. I know she is opponent lawyer, but one should have to think about the justice too. It's not always about proving your opponent wrong, it's should be about what's right what's wrong and she didn't know for sure those photos were trick photography. She should have stopped for a sec and thought what If these photos are true, then is my client really innocent? Ultimately you are fighting for the justice to prevail not to just win and loose.

I guess, I am talking about morals and ethics which doesn't exist these days in the profession of law because of lawyers ambitions to win the case instead of fight for justice. It's very sad na😭.

@green exactly what i thought.this point is poking in my mind since y'day.i agree that in law profession if the opponent presents some proof your work is to proove them wrong and defend your client.its fair.

but here whenever the case matter comes siddhi claims that she too doesn't take or fight for the wrong case.at the same time she already said previously that she knows kunal doesn't support wrong cases.then if kunal presented pics did she even try to find how genuine his pics are before proving him wrong.siddhi is always saying i'm doing my work is irritating-i kind of felt that she's just applying bookish knowledge like if kunal comes up with this proof,my argument will be this.

i agree we dont know yet who is right/wrong among nisha/rohit but at least kunal is collecting/getting proofs means something genuine in nisha's version.ok even if we take worst possibility that nisha prearranged all these proofs,isn't it siddhi's responsibility to at least do some ground work on her own like enquiring if rohit is really speaking truth or not rather than simply studying the file which richa gave her n proceeding with her arguments.sorry to say but i felt her way of working in the case to be similar to thakral if he would have taken this case.whenever she says even i dont fight for wrong,i get doubt "does she really mean that"

Edited by -sahasra- - 13 years ago

Quote

-Rani

@-Rani

Trailblazer

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

#17

Originally posted by: -sahasra-
@green exactly what i thought.this point is poking in my mind since y'day.i agree that in law profession if the opponent presents some proof your work is to proove them wrong and defend your client.its fair.

but here whenever the case matter comes siddhi claims that she too doesn't take or fight for the wrong case.at the same time she already said previously that she knows kunal doesn't support wrong cases.then if kunal presented pics did she even try to find how genuine his pics are before proving him wrong.siddhi is always saying i'm doing my work is irritating-i kind of felt that she's just applying bookish knowledge like if kunal comes up with this proof,my argument will be this.

i agree we dont know yet who is right/wrong among nisha/rohit but at least kunal is collecting/getting proofs means something genuine in nisha's version.ok even if we take worst possibility that nisha prearranged all these proofs,isn't it siddhi's responsibility to at least do some ground work on her own like enquiring if rohit is really speaking truth or not rather than simply studying the file which richa gave her n proceeding with her arguments.sorry to say but i felt her way of working in the case to be similar to thakral if he would have taken this case.whenever she says even i dont fight for wrong,i get doubt "does she really mean that"

Thank you shasra, this is exactly what I have been trying to convey all along. It irritates me too whenever she says I am just doing my job. There is a difference between doing your job and doing it correctly. Just her to say I am doing my job doesn't make her stand on the innocent side. She should give her reasoning for saying that she firmly believes that Rohit is innocent.

You are right, just because Witcha told her that her brother is innocent or just by reading Rohit's file, which is prepared by Thakaral's, she believes that Rohit is innocent. As If she could care less whether Rohit is guilty or innocent, she only cares about proving Kunal's evidences are wrong.

By saying, I too don't take wrong cases, which can mean only one thing that Kunal is on the wrong side. What really made her believe that those photos were fake? I mean did she even stop to think that the photos might be legitimate? Specially If Kunal is presenting them, there might be good chance that they are real as he is known to be honest and fair. Guess, it doesn't matter to her, all she cares is doing her job right (whatever that means?).

If she really cared to do her job right, which is getting the justice done, she would do more research before proving her opponents evidence wrong. I liked what Kunal said to his teacher about Siddhi that "she only cares to win the case either by hook or crook". That is really proving to be true here isn't it? Working for Thakarals has really messed up her brains.

Edited by Iamrani - 13 years ago

Quote

@-Nightingale-

Stunner

+ 5

Posted: 13 years ago

#18

Sidhi is doing her job...n its true...she has no chance to think ing good or bad...according to her..the good is retaining the job for her family...

n i guess the photograph idea is of Richa..as she was the one who got them...

we need to wait till things unfold rather than beating over the bush..

Quote

jheel1

@jheel1

Explorer

Posted: 13 years ago

#19

When this case was thrust upon Siddhi, she wasn't asked if she thought Rohit was innocent or guilty. She was told by her employer, Richa, who she stupidly thinks is a 'nice' person that her bro is innocent.
Dumb as it is, that is the premise she is working on.
On the other hand, there is no proof (yet) against him so she has to surmise that he is innocent.

Reg. the pix, she didn't say they were fake, she made the court aware of the possibility that they could be fake & rightly so. Those pix could be fake & as rohit's lawyer she needs to point it out. It is a lawyer's duty to prove the opposition wrong.

Now lets talk of Kunal.
When he took Nisha's case, what proof did he have that she was being truthful? Did he have any solid proof about Rohit's guilt?
No, he saw Rohit knock a man down in his car & decided that he must be guilty of everything else in life too.
In reality Kunal's reason for taking this case is fueled by his hatred for the Thakrals & now his misplaced dislike for his wife is spurring him on even more.

Sure, in the next epis they might show that Rohit is guilty & it would be interesting to see how siddhi would react then, but as of yet I dont think she is wrong in the way she has handled the case.

I dont blame you'll for the way you'll are thinking, the cvs simply haven't been able to get a grip on the way they want to portray these characters.

Kunal was supposed to be this 'gem' of a guy who lived by his principles. On the contrary he comes across as a judgmental, opinionated ass who cant even read the writing on the wall.
Even in the past epis when Siddhi was with Anand, he suspected, blamed, belittled her without a shred of proof. Intelligent lawyer ki toh dur ki baat, first try to portray him as a logical human being.
Keerti's role has very little scope to grow, she'll keep playing this wonderful haloed bahu & patni for the rest of this show. What would be nice is, if she could find her tongue & actually say something once in a while.

I know Siddhi (Keerti) irritates some of you, all I can say in her favor is that I've seen worse😆 Ekta's female leads are usually quite ordinary, not to mention horizontally challenged.
Its usually the males that are required to carry that X factor, since the majority of TV viewers are female😛

What annoys me the most is that in our serials the leads usually appear so dumb. Be it the middle class hero, or a rich tycoon, they have no idea what goes on at home or in the office😕 Its usually the villains/vamps that show an IQ of above 2.

Edited by jheel1 - 13 years ago

Quote

yogithabe

@yogithabe

Beginner

Posted: 13 years ago

#20

Here i thought Kunal ws a strong hero tht Ekta created... Looks like shes making him also dumb by falling into Richa's trap.. too bad!!! Ekta think a bit diff atleast sometime!!!😡

Quote

1 2 3

Parichay November 10 - Written Update - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics