Did 3 acts deserve 30? - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

45

Views

4.4k

Users

24

Likes

155

Frequent Posters

E-friend thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#31
Great chemistry is not all about licking chocolate from their partners and getting Judges to lick their chocolate fingers.

A and M were the best! The aerial act was such a pleasant sight unlike the gross chocolate sight. A and M deserve more than 30+! And HIMRUTA deserved the second place

Was sad to see beautiful Ash and Hilarious Mr Nag leave. Will miss them on this show. The dramaebaad UPMA are still on this show for TRP and genuine honest couples are leaving.
bee5 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#32

Originally posted by: HippoSucks



I am not sure where you are getting the idea from that all performances on this show much have a large component of "chemistry".

The main objective of this show is dancing. An aerial act is considered a dance performance. Just because they dance as couples doesn't necessarily imply that any dance performance where there isn't any romance is incomplete.



If u r "not sure" then u need update urself with what this show is about.
Before jumping to conclusions, u also need to read what i wrote clearly if u choose to quote my post. Did i ever write "Largely" for chemistry? No. Did i write that their performance was "incomplete"? No.

If u r writing ur own views then u can do so without quoting mine. There is no need to exaggerate and lead my comments to something else which it was not.

P.s: I hv no favoruites and hence hv no interest in fan wars.



HippoSucks thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Networker 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#33

Originally posted by: bee5



If u r "not sure" then u need update urself with what this show is about.
Before jumping to conclusions, u also need to read what i wrote clearly if u choose to quote my post. Did i ever write "Largely" for chemistry? No. Did i write that their performance was "incomplete"? No.

If u r writing ur own views then u can do so without quoting mine. There is no need to exaggerate and lead my comments to something else which it was not.

P.s: I hv no favoruites and hence hv no interest in fan wars.



Let's not be pedantic here. Just because you didn't say "largely", "incomplete" etc does not mean that it is not what you meant (or at least what I inferred from your post).

What I think is implied from your post is that you believe Mayuresh and Ajisha's performance was not so good (which can also be referred to as being "incomplete") because they lacked chemistry.

You said "I as a viewer will point it out if that is lacking." in reference to the performance. Lacking is basically a synonym for incomplete with this context.

You also said "But it is their responsibility to also add chemistry in it however they want if that is one of the MAIN criteria." which implies that according to you "chemistry" should be a large factor in the performance.

Please read what I said again. It was definitely directed towards the post I quoted.


Edited by HippoSucks - 10 years ago
E-friend thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#34
@Hippo who doesn't suck much :p

Don't worry, intelligent people like myself has read your post and agree with your points made, your quoting was bang on!
bee5 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#35

Originally posted by: HippoSucks



Let's not be pedantic here. Just because you didn't say "largely", "incomplete" etc does not mean that it is not what you meant (or at least what I inferred from your post).

What I think is implied from your post is that you believe Mayuresh and Ajisha's performance was not so good (which can also be referred to as being "incomplete") because they lacked chemistry.

You said "I as a viewer will point it out if that is lacking." in reference to the performance. Lacking is basically a synonym for incomplete with this context.

Please read what I said again. It was definitely directed towards the post I quoted.





U seem to be assuming too much here.
1. Assumption that my post was directed to what u wrote.
2. Assumption that my comments are supposed to mean M-A performance's as incomplete.
Plus who gave you the right to decide to be Pendantic or Not be Pendantic?
U r dictating terms to me and violating rules here!

Stick to what i wrote without extrapolating and coming to non-existant conclusions. Atleast not with me.


manu91 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#36
@ HippoSucks i agree with ur points. In aerial acts , chemistry can't be shown all the time. In partners aerial act, transitions from one step to another should be clean and well co-ordinated. and chemistry doesn't come only by touching. it can also be seen when couple made eye contacts.
now next episode will be teen ka tadka round, we will see the chemistry in three people. 😆
manasa.hegde thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#37
Yes it was good sensuous... but dance was only in corridor after they jumped into tub it was their own romance... Dance gaya tel lene... Anyways this years dance performance is not judged only on dance, chemistry, love compatibility everything... so 30 includes all that... N I DO NOT want UPMA to win this show... Can't bare that Karishma's attitude.
Edited by CT_Shreya - 10 years ago
Natkat thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#38
For me the best acts were upmas it deserved 30.Vulgarity is in the mind of person.not in the act. act was sensuous and beautiful.
HippoSucks thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Networker 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#39

Originally posted by: bee5



U seem to be assuming too much here.
1. Assumption that my post was directed to what u wrote.
2. Assumption that my comments are supposed to mean M-A performance's as incomplete.
Plus who gave you the right to decide to be Pendantic or Not be Pendantic?
U r dictating terms to me and violating rules here!

Stick to what i wrote without extrapolating and coming to non-existant conclusions. Atleast not with me.




What are you talking about?

I never said that your first post was directed towards me.

As I said before, you stated clearly that their performance was "lacking". I said that you said their performance was incomplete, which is basically the same thing...

It is common sense that if you say that their performance was "lacking", and I say that you said that their performance was "incomplete", then there is nothing wrong with it.

What rules am I violating?

It isn't extrapolating at all. I just use a synonym...
Edited by HippoSucks - 10 years ago
HippoSucks thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Networker 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#40

Originally posted by: manu91

@ HippoSucks i agree with ur points. In aerial acts , chemistry can't be shown all the time. In partners aerial act, transitions from one step to another should be clean and well co-ordinated. and chemistry doesn't come only by touching. it can also be seen when couple made eye contacts.

now next episode will be teen ka tadka round, we will see the chemistry in three people. 😆



Exactly. If you're literally flying in the air, you are not able to make constant physical contact with your partner (or if you do, then the "aerial" part if the aerial act will be lacking). I saw Mayuresh and Ajisha making eye contact with each other, moving around each other etc many times. "Chemistry" isn't all about taking a chocolate bath or doing a water act with your partner.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".