Is it wrong to move on?

Tell me guys...what's wrong in moving on? If a person's love is no more, then what's wrong in loving someone else?
People are saying why did Bela choose Mahir over 100 years love. I am asking why can't she?
Bela didn't know that Vikrant was alive. She found someone who loves her so deeply that she moved on from her old love. I don't see anything wrong in this.
Some people are even saying that Bela doesn't know that Vikrant is negative so she should choose him. Why so? Is it necessary that a person should move on only if the old partner was evil ? Even if Vikrant was shown positive, Bela would have been completely right in still choosing Mahir because she started loving him when she was under the impression that Vikrant was no more. So how is she morally wrong?
Love is not a joke that purana pyar wapas aa gaya toh uske pas chale jaao. Now Bela loves Mahir...even if Vikrant is not evil, Bela is doing nothing wrong in choosing Mahir. She didn't love Mahir when she was with Vikrant. So how is she wrong?

Moving on without proper reason is also not wrong .as they say new love intensity more than old love

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

Moving on without proper reason is also not wrong .as they say new love intensity more than old love

But it makes her look whimsical .and capricious and weak character .without proper reason .

And bashers logic is what's the guarantee she will stay with present love .she might move on tomorrow to another love if Mahir suppose kidnapped for say 6 MONTHS and she thinks he is dead

Originally posted by: MallikaDua

@Bold...without proper reason? How come? She thought thatVikrant was no more. Isn't it a proper reason to move on? Ye necessary hai kya ki purana insaan bura ho tab hi move on karo?

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

Yeah being dead is proper reason for me .same logic applies to mahir too ..if she thinks he us dead she might move on from him also and I accept it .

Originally posted by: MallikaDua

Yes why not...there's no wrong in moving on.

U r right but no point explaining these facts to people who believe in ideal platonic love of the kind shown in television others r fan of Rajat I really don't understand that why people can't differentiate between a actor nd a character. They defend their fav character to any limits

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

👍🏼now we both r on same boat .

Nope ...because you think that Bela doesn't know that Vikrant is negative so she us wrong in moving on...but I don't think so.

Actually in normal circumstances if a gf bf is there n bf or gf is dead than ppl don't move on so early ..because u r not close to someone..so living alone takes time for wounds to get healed..

Originally posted by: naaznin

Actually in normal corcumscircum if a gf bf is there n bf or gf is dead than ppl don't move on so early ..because u don't get close to someone..it takes time ..

but if gf/bf is dead n their partners get married to someone else than moving on is a quick process because of the closeness with their spouse ..so if any girl would be at bela's place same would have happen and even if maahir is dead n bela's move on from him to I would say still nothing wrong in that too..why should we be sadistic that v want a person to keep crying for old love they lost when they can be happy with someone else ... doesn't divorcee n widows remarriage permitted in law n society than why obsession over 100yrs of platonic love

my answer would be they see too many of daily soaps nd they r way too attached to character played by their fav actor nd logic sense can go to hell for that they can be sadistic nd believe one should perform sati when the first love dies