good old days of TV r gone-just read this

niti_26 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#1
The idiot box, that's what television was called in its good old Doordarshan days. It started at 6 pm with the Satyam Shivam Sundaram logo that gave way to a traditionally dressed presenter who read out the programme for the day. I still remember Chhaya Geet, Phool Khile Hain Gulshan Gulshan and the Sunday feature film were the hottest shows. In fact, one watched Saptahiki (the weekly programme guide) only to find out which film would be shown on the following Sunday.
If it were a hit film, you were assured that dinner would be ready early, roads would be clear and shops closed. If you walked down a lonely street you could hear Amitabh Bachchan romancing Rekha in every home. Well, it was after all a Sunday and there was a film on television. I feel nostalgic. Today, when television is throbbing with new programmes, ideas, concepts and formats, why would I think of days when the only colours one saw on television were black and white? Today, when the debate on is whether daily soaps or reality television are bigger, why does my mind want to stay still for a moment and ponder over what television once was? Because what it provided was entertainment for one and all. It held your attention for the entire evening. And when it ended, it left the viewers fulfilled. I wonder if television does that today. If we look closely and try to think of shows like Ek Kahani, Darpan, Buniyaad, Hum Log, Nukkad or even Fauji, we can safely say that each had a distinctive story. Stories that touched the heart, brought a smile and even a tear. Master Haveliram could still give Armaan Sir a run for his money as the sweet Teacherji from Nukkad could topple any of our overdressed bahus of today. So what was it that made television so novel in those days and why are we today running round in circles trying to present our viewers with the same plots, the same negative vamps, the same doings of the protagonist? Why is there no fresh programming? This is a question that every channel, producer and writer needs to ask today. Where are we going with television today? TV is starving for fresh shows, plots and ideas that are radically different. It's very easy to look at a show and decide that if one person can do it, so can I. But why don't we say that if that person can do it, I will do it better? Has time made us sluggish or have we depleted our creative resources completely? I just hope that the answer to both the above is no, because that is what I would like to believe. We need to think and reinvent. We need to look beyond the set parameters and create new ones. Let's make television viewing truly entertaining and pleasurable. (It's an article I found on net)...

******Today's television serials r just 🤢🤢🤢, and 'mamta' is a big big eg:......do u people agree??????

Edited by niti_26 - 18 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

6

Views

683

Users

3

Frequent Posters

hiral_anju0930 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 18 years ago
#2
niti.. i am going to comment on this... but not today.. tommorow morning.. just remind me if i forget.. i have an article that i wrote related to this...
Chits1 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#3
niti,thanks for the wonderful article.I can't forget the good old days of saptahiki and chitrahaar.I miss those days.Thanks for this wonderful article.
niti_26 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: anju0930

niti.. i am going to comment on this... but not today.. tommorow morning.. just remind me if i forget.. i have an article that i wrote related to this...

u asked me to remind u,so here I'am.......................go ahead with ur article ,Anju......................😊

hiral_anju0930 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 18 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: niti_26

u asked me to remind u,so here I'am.......................go ahead with ur article ,Anju......................😊

thanks niti.. wait, let me look for the article and post it up... 😃

hiral_anju0930 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 18 years ago
#6

Entertainment at its worst



We are in an era where, TV has entered our minds, hearts, conversations and have succeeded in taking up slots of our daily schedule. Shows struggle to find the perfect slot on their channels. With all of the racket going on, viewers might land up with a variety of shows to look forward to.
It only takes 30 minutes to get addicted to a show. While viewers grumble and curse the production houses for lack of creativity, they yet cannot resist grabbing their remotes to watch the same show day after day. Be it Balaji, be it Shreya creations, or be it DJ's creative unit, all struggle day after day to make sure their show isn't on the hitlist of the programming heads.
Every channel is trying to go for a makeover. Zee took the initiative of coming up with its own list, shows with low TRPs - Jab love hua, Sindoor and Mamta. Time has already come to bid farewell to Sindoor, but time hasn't struck yet for the other two shows. Sony too came up with their list - Kalvaddhu shutting off, was a shocker to the audience and to the industry and warning lights have been shown to Jite hain jiske liye and Durgesh Nandini. Star isn't far behind in wrapping up KBC 3, the advantage KBC gets is that it's a seasonal show. Thus, things there end on a positive note. We have witnessed that Kayamat isn't doing too well, and so are Kasam se and Saath Phere. The TRPs have taken a down fall there too. But in all the make over racket, where do viewers find themselves? They struggle for new characters, new story and new actors, who they can relate with. Rather than replacing new born shows like Kalvaddhu or the two year old infant shows like Sindoor, Channels could rather give an extreme make over to the shows itself. Sindoor is taken over by - Parviar, again, a female protagonist in dismay. Shows that are for kids are shown at 11, while shows like Mamta, being a soap, is at 7 - what went wrong here is that wrong time slots were allotted by the channel. Breaking the rules come few new shows like Left Right left. LRL could not hold on to its viewers, however, the show was put on hold for the World Cup 2007. Here they could have put the show on a more popular channel - Sony rather than Sab to get better viewer ship.
Will channels help their shows out? Or will the hunting continue by creative heads? Will the shows have to shut down for getting zero publicity and misleading feedbacks? Or Will India see a new production houses making their marks? Well, only Zee, Sony and Star can tell.

- Hiral Bhatt

Edited by anju0930 - 18 years ago
niti_26 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#7

one more article dealing with the same subject: 😊

Missing on TV: Entertainment
Shailaja BajpaiPosted online: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 at 0000 hrs

Serials are repetitive and unimaginative. Plots are invariably funereal


There's a new entertainment channel coming to the screen closest to you and while this might be a moment of rejoicing for you, other channels will be less pleased. More competition. Let's hope that does not translate into more sameness, otherwise you will be displeased, too.

NDTV is setting out to entertain us. Not a moment too soon. We do not need to study electronic viewership measurement systems (TRPs) to know we're watching less of what passes for general entertainment. When we watch TV for recreation, it's the news channels we turn to. They telecast more films, cricket, page-whatever-types and now stand-up comedy (some would say the news became a joke long ago) than Star Plus, Sony, Zee, Sahara One, Sab and Star One, perhaps put together.

These officially designated entertainment channels have suffered collective amnesia.😆 They don't remember what they are supposed to do. They live in circa 2000, when Kaun Banega Crorepati made Amitabh Bachchan (and vice-versa) and the monstrous regiment of K women marched into our homes to make themselves comfortable amongst us. Star Plus, their host, became the most popular channel and the others followed with their own saas-bahu sagas. It was great for a while but then they overstayed their welcome and their entertainment value decreased the longer they stayed.

Polite, we continued to entertain them, hoping things would change, but they continued down the successful beaten track and we began to leave or switch to other shows that offered alternatives. Which may explain why Zee, with one trademarked K serial, has been appreciated.

Like all guests who outstay their time, the K serials have become highly repetitive. In two ways: First, they ape their own past. So you will see that Kyunki... is caught up in a rape just as it was a few years ago when Nandini was raped. The serials also imitate their K sisters. So if Parvati returned to Kahani... radiant and refreshed (as well as much older but younger to look at) in a speedboat so Arra ra Daksha-behn sails back into Kyunki..., radiant and refreshed (older-younger) riding ditto speedboat.

Predictability can be comforting but hardly entertaining without a novelty quotient but the K serials or shows like CID (that has run forever on Sony), are monotonous and unimaginative — in other words, not entertaining. The younger generation of characters, introduced to rejuvenate the serials, has succeeded in only ageing them further. Seriously: Last calculations place Kyunki's Baa in the 100-110 age group. That makes Tulsi and her generation close to 60. How long can leading characters of shows, our constant companions for the last seven years, be senior citizens (with all due respect to them)? Especially, since they are no Helen Mirrens?

No wonder the audience is looking at its wristwatches and wondering when they will leave. No wonder viewership is falling and will soon fall away, unless they are careful.

No wonder a new entertainment channel sounds so good.

And no wonder we have mixed reactions to a new show such as Virrudh (Sony) launched by the face that launched the K women into orbit — Smriti Irani. This Sony serial is of interest to all of us in the media business because it is about the media business. However, the lead characters are actors who have been around seven years and many more. They look overage, overweight, over the hill. We watch television for good drama — and this has the makings of one that is not about women against women — but it must be fresh, vibrant, pulsating with life. Virrudh looks rather funereal already.😕

Femina Miss India (Sony) throbbed with young blood and very attractive females. Except for Sajid Khan, the male anchor. He looked like he belonged on Viruddh as did, may we add, several judges. Mona Singh fizzed but honestly? She's a better actress — and dancer — than anchor. And someone should tell Sony that, like our cricketers, it must restrict the number of ads it has for such shows because by the time Miss Indias were crowned, even our TVs have fallen asleep. 😆

he......he......enjoyyyyyy!!!!!! 😆😆😆


Edited by niti_26 - 18 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".