Dharma adharma, I don't understand, pls. Help

Always_His_Jaan thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#1
It was Udhister, who gambled his wife and brothers, isn't that adharma?? True that dhrushashan should not have done that but panchali was duriyodhan's dasi. Even udhipster didn't stopped this because he kind of knew that panchali was duriyodhan's servant. But then again, isn't it adharma to treat woman like this? Why didn't he stopped this?

Created

Last reply

Replies

1

Views

822

Users

2

Likes

1

Frequent Posters

srishtisingh thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#2
it was aa twisted sense of dharma which resulted in such a heinous crime. it was yudi addiction and gullibility, it was fault of whole sabha relying on technicalities rather than morality,it was fault of a blind king,it was dominance of bro dharma above pati dharma, it was jealousy and revenge which resulted in this adharma

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".