I am noticing that many are complaining that in order to fit VD into the story suddenly the script of the show has been totally changed.
But is this true ?
If we sit back and think then we will understand that whatever is happening now was already there on the cards. AK made his entry as a negative character isn't it.
1) A person who tries to erase the existence of an individual and also took over the entire property, can we really call him a positive character?
2) Do you remember what AK told Pam? What he said was that if JM had indeed been RK's daughter then he would have filled her life with such sorrow that she would have suffered her entire life. So it was known to us that the day AK comes to know the true identity of JM, the equation between them would change immediately. Since AK is negative then obviously a male protagonist was required opposite him. We all are happy that VD has come. If not VD then somebody else would have surely come. Also Raju character (MC) is not a sudden thing.
JM is just opposite to what her mother was. SM was very composed and JM has been portrayed as a clumsy character. I guess that was done intentionally so as to perfectly show her character transformation. After Raju came into her life, she is not only handling herself but also looking after Raju and we can see how slowly a strong bond is forming between the two.
P.S. : I think the script is still the same. Raju character was bound to make an entry. It was pre-decided that AK will be negative and JM's character transformation from clumsy to composed was also fixed from before hand--------- VD's entry didn't change anything in the script.