Posted:
Originally posted by: taraka2005
in the first place they dont consider it as molestation but find it as touchy touchy hawt chemistry and love beyond words thats why they want in place of Madhu 🤢😕
I wrote these two posts in their hail sultan topic :
Originally posted by chiknichameli07
Getting molested? Where? Who? Are we even watching the same show? Or its the drugs exhibiting their adverse effects? 🤔 😈
Originally posted by cardio21
And are you trying to say that getting molested is better thanliving with thelove of one's life?
And are you trying to say that getting molested is better thanliving with thelove of one's life?
I am saying in the most basic terms today because I think that is the language a few people would understand.
Married unmarried is irrelevant. The only relevant thing is a woman's choice.
So yes RK kidnapped MB to stay with him, chained her etc.etc.. But did she ever spit on him.
No. Did her expressions ever show that she was finding his attentions repulsive. There was only anger. And RK could see that. Remember the scene where RK called her in the studio (just before kidnapping her) and she was leaning for a kiss.
there is a whale of difference between being angry at someone and being repulsed by some one.
Sultan repulses MB. It is obvious the way she reacts at his touch now.
And a normal woman I repeat the words A NORMAL WOMAN would feel disgusted and repulsed at a man she is not interested in touching her. Afterall MB is not shown a S***t in the serial ki koi bhi chalega..
At least do not take that right from a woman. Forget marriage now. I am saying she has a right to decide who she wants to kiss, touch or sleep with.
A man cannot decide he is the better option for her or the woman should find him attractive or love him. And everybody has different choice. MB is entitled to her choice or not?
First answer this - it is her right to select her man or not?
Its ok to like a negative character - again the right to choose but don't say what Sultan is doing to MB is right.
And then the second one after I got the reply which I have given later:
The Bachcha Party needs to be explained a few pertinent points:
1. It is the intent of the touch that matters. Upar se pakda, neeche se pakda, biceps pakda, held her upper arms forcefully - ok but was the touch with a sexual or lecherous intent?
2. Friends touch each other so many time during conversation. on face, arms, even hug each other - it is just friendship & cannot be equated with "advances" or misbehaviour.
3. So how many times a husband forcefully held his wife or a wife forcefully held her husband or shook him/her or a friend touched a man in a friendly gesture or someone held someone's arm to question - the imp. point is was there any sexual intent behind it?
4. The question here is of making sexual/lecherous/romantic advances - thru words, suggestions and/or actions towards a woman who was finding them disgusting.
5. Though I realise that kiddos who find a friendly off screen hug between two friends (one of who is happily married), hott & tohfaa might not know what is an indecent advance and what is not.
And RK fans are called immature. At least they are not kids who dont understand basic human gestures.
And now say that this post was too long so u wouldnt read it or better say that since I had not liked your XYZ post u will not read this post.
Go on. Its ok. I expect this much from kiddos.
And guess what reply did I get:
First post:
The post was too long so they would'nt read it.
Second: No reply as yet
Cricket
Current Affairs
