Originally posted by: _innocent_
😆😆
I havent watched the episode yet!.. But reading your update on it! I am amazed at how stupid a set of creatives can be! How can they justify his character now? Especially after the speech they made MB say in that court room? Are they stating that one ought to overlook certain torture and forgive the perpetrator just because what he attacked from the back?😕 RK might not have beaten up MB like Ballu used to do with Padmini, but can one really justify his behaviour? I am baffled! Seriously, I dont understand how this can be justified! So when a man causes your father to fight against death, he should be forgiven within a heartbeat, but when your father does the same, he ought to be blacklisted! OK FIRST MISTAKE!
And now, for a slap, one ought to marry a girl, (making a mockery out of marriage) pretending to have a defected childhood, using one's dead father's suicide as means to get forward, are all fair and logical! OK POINT NOTED CVS!
I dont want Rishbala after this, I dont care if people like what I have written or not! KIll off RK please! He is not the essence of the story, in fact he seems like the villain, and evil dont ever win, according to cvs right? So why the difference in treatment here? "🥱 Is it because people were staing VD can only do BBB scenes? I mean is that why cvs have gone back to the old RK?😕
How can MB trust RK now? He has pretended he was willing to die for her, and yet that was fake?:S If he brought back Ballu, then seriously thats just disgusting!🥱
Anyone trying to justify RK, watch the court scene again! and tell me what is the difference between the man MB described should be killed and RK?!🥱