Madhu's Life at cross roads .

Madhu's Life at cross roads ….

Any high point in life we always have 2 paths 2 choose from the right or wrong ….

Some times the path what seems as right & more realistic may not be the right one may be the wrong one & what seems to be the wrong path may be the right path ….

So what is the right path & what is the wrong path ?????????????

1)Is The path where we benefit is the right path ?????

Or

2) the path where we loose every thing is the right path ????? coz at the end of the day we are a looser & we have nothing or no one by our side ….. we lost every thing but still stuck to principles or morals we have been taught … so that's why even after being right & have taken the right decision we are wrong ?

Here madhu has 2 paths 2 choose ….

1)Take back the case against R.K. & ditch mukund & family … leave mukund or his family as they are also are using madhu for their advantage & madhu is unaware of it …. So if we see … dixit family or trishna have taken option 1 …. & want benefits out of the hit & run case ….

2) But madhu wants 2 take option 2 … stick to her principles …. Why coz she thinks that she needs 2 get that person the desired punishment what he truly deserves … that person even after doing the accident has no regrets & moreover was proud enough to trash a alcohol bottle in the middle of the road after the accident …

Madhu filed a case against the person so that the mistake does not repeat in future & learns from mistake …

Here the problem arised coz of his superstar status … so what if he is a super star … a life is more important than his super star status ….even if its not R.K. … madhu would still b fighting the case …. What madhu is doing Is totally right …. I don't think so madhu is fighting against R.K. she is fighting against that man who is responsible for hit & run …. That man in turn who is responsible is R.K…. so fighting case against R.k. or the person responsible for the accident are one and the same …

R.K. is a film actor in this case …. If he is not film actor then it can b any spoilt brat who has power & money & influence … who can directly or indirectly affect madhu or her family …. & can use influence & can directly cause harm to her & her family or her neighbors …

So in this case what should a common man do …

Be a puppet & agree to the monetary deal or if not threaten & withdraw a case …. (that's what happen's in 99% cases …) but here our madhu is not like that …..

Just because madhu does not want to do this she is wrong coz because of her thoughts she has put many lives at stake …. Oh yes I forgot …. Here madhu's sisters dreams are at stake isn't it .. so definitely madhu is wrong …

One question …. If any one can answer me ….

Why was trishna offered the role as a item gurl in R.K. movie ?

Trishna did not get the audition or chance 2 b an item coz of her talent she got that role coz she is madhu bala 's sister who has filed a complaint against R.K. …

If madhu was not witness & some xyz a witness … will trishna be called to R.k.'s house …. No never … she would not have even been allowed near the premises of his house …

All of a sudden …. Trishna & roma's talent has come 2 notice of R.K. & trishna got a chance … seriously …. How 2 imagine that ….

Just because madhu is not willing 2 take case back madhu is wrong …. If R.K. can break their livelihood any other person who is equally influential can also do the same … have we not seen any cases like that in real life … many powerful people have played with people's lives when it comes 2 saving their skin …. They harass people so that the filed case is taken back … 2 hide 1 crime … many other crimes are committed in the process ….

So now what should madhu do … Just because that man here R.K. is so powerful … shall madhu keep aside her principles & stop fighting … & withdraw the case … coz her sister will b benefited …. Yes dixit family will also be benefited … but the person who will b benefited most out of this is trishna … coz without doing any hard work or struggle she got what she wanted …. Role in R.K.'s movie ….

One doubt ….

If madhu takes back the case …. then tomorrow …. will she be not called as a selfish & manipulative & greedy person … who can use any1 to fulfill her dreams ….. correction …. its her dream coz her sisters dreams are her dreams over here isn't it.

&

so what if one mukund is lying in a hospital … be a witness 2 any accident & then take advantage of the situation & gain what ever you can ….. from the culprit … use him or her to the full what ever you can … is this what every one wants ???? coz I am failing to understand ….

that's why today madhu is wrong … Coz she does not want to do this …. She does not want to use R.K. to fulfill her dreams … correction her sisters dreams ….

Is this what reality is …. Is this what people want …. As long as we are not affected or not at loss …. sab kuch chaltha hain … doesn't this mean that we are selfish & manipulative & does this not mean that we are using people to get our work done ….

So what is the moral ….

Moral is … as long as we benefit from any one …the path what we take is the right path … even though it's the wrong path …. So madhu should take this path ….

But I think … the path madhu has taken is the right path …. i.e. option 2 …where she is fighting the case against R.K. ….

I would like 2 see what turn the story will take & how madhu shall convince trishna ….

It's a long way for madhu 2 convince trishna or roma … rift will definitely develop … but I would like 2 see how madhu will deal with R.K. without bending …

Sorry for the super long post ….

Thank you for reading ….