Originally posted by: Intellienough
there is diff between prem and heer
'Heer: always hideous ,,She lied for everything and made prem react preleap and hence his supposedly sin...Heer came to make up only when it was too late.When prem was in agony she sided rajveer and left him in that condition without bothering.Instead she shud have realised the reason of his behaviour and be with him she left him alone all shattered.
Prem; Ash case he cud have hide everything but he showed his determination and stood up with the truth pre leap and post leap too.He never once even thought of hiding any thing...
Both were wronged so why only prem should apolise?/ why not heer do the same thing with prem that she booked a room in his name with her friend.Why she did not come up with the truth abt gy3 and said everything to prem and he wud have dealt it together,
prem was at receiving end when heer left him at her will .She may have suffered hardship but she did moved on in those 6 yrs though she did not got married but in sense she tried to forget prem for ever.
While prem He tortured himself for the sin for 6 yrs by keeping himseld aloof and seperated and not once he forgot heer from his memory,
Heer bashed prem with so many adjectives like womaniser, insulted him all the way...was that not enough...for the deed he did.He never filed custody and tried to save heer still ..Heer insulted prem's love at shiv mandir by saying that she curse the day she met prem for first time and fell in love...
Now tell me who was always on receiving end..and who did not tend to believe.
Heer trusted everyone except prem.Never opened herself where she shud trying to become all mahan.while prem had always shared his things to her except hole in heart track becoz he did not wanted to make heer miserable.
I think i said enough
Marathi TV
