Now that the worst possible justification for housefly’s ill acts is surfacing through sick dialogues challenging sanity and anything that’s remotely logical, I honestly wonder why Komolika is even labelled a vamp in this show.
Since everything can be justified in the name of love, why is Komolika trashed for her acts while housefly gets away with zilch guiltiness and cries victim?
After all, Komolika never threw her lover down a bridge. She didn’t hand over Diya to an unknown woman knowing very well that the girl’s life is awfully endangered. She didn’t character assassinate her lover to save herself. Yeah she troubled a lot of people. But, didn’t housefly do the same thing? He did it in a much greater degree.
Yeah it’s known that Komolika is a murderer. BUT it can easily be justified right? After all, it was for LOVE. LOL!
If housefly’s acts can still be labelled love despite the diabolical toxicity and the destructive consequences, why shouldn’t Komolika get the same privilege?
In this show, the only thing that doesn't favour Komolika is the presence of forced divine symbolism...which is sickening and even blasphemous to say the least.
Thanks to filthy housefly’s ill acts and absence of guilt,the line between the so-called vamp and the hero(?) is totally gone.