Karan and drapaudi

Page

Next Last

Adhya

@Agni_Jytsona

Sparkler

+ 17

Posted: 7 years ago

Drapaudi and Karan are two most interesting characters of the great epic apart from Krishna and Arjun

Drapaudi and Krishna are two of my most favourite characters followed by abhimanyu I absolutely ado re them and I respect Karan for his courage and determination though I loathe him to both in equal measure you see it have this "I hate you like I love you" kind of relationship with him and with Arjuna too 😆

So coming back to the topic it's has been my dream to see say sequence where Karna and drapaudi converse before the great epic and discuss about everything from their actions to their regrets from their expectations to their disappointments and also about what they think about the war

I think if handled well it can turn out be a great conversation

Plus these are only two characters who never really had any confrontation in their great epic if we leave aside all the conjecture about the probable insults that they inflicted at each other and their so called love affair

Quote

Frequent Posters

Adhya

@Agni_Jytsona

Sparkler

+ 17

Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: Chakka_Arjun
I dont know why people are interested in Karn-Draupadi more than Karn-Uruvi. Karn-Draupadi love story is fake doesnt exist in original versions. Infact karna's wife is unknown in epic. Draupadi was karn hater and in same way Karn wife was arjun hater then why all these fake stories?

who is intrested in their lovestory i am certainly not i was just talking a conversation conversation got it

plus urvi is just folk story there is no mention of her by vyas

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

SweetRogue

@SweetRogue

Explorer

Posted: 7 years ago

I don't think they could've had a civil conversation to be honest. I mean this was a man who called her a wh**e, may have ordered her public stripping, asked Dusshasan to drag her to the servants' apartments and told her to have sex with someone from the Kaurava side. Can any woman have a civil conversation with a man who did that to her?

Quote

SweetRogue

@SweetRogue

Explorer

Posted: 7 years ago

@MahaganduArjun @ChakkaArjun @BrihuAunty I know you're the same person. tt is evident from your usernames itself that you are no serious reader or researcher on Mahabharata. You can't even spell simple English words like liar. Any person with half a brain would understand what you are. I don't give a shit what you say. I'm not going to argue any further with dumb f**ks

Quote

Adhya

@Agni_Jytsona

Sparkler

+ 17

Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: SweetRogue
I don't think they could've had a civil conversation to be honest. I mean this was a man who called her a wh**e, may have ordered her public stripping, asked Dusshasan to drag her to the servants' apartments and told her to have sex with someone from the Kaurava side. Can any woman have a civil conversation with a man who did that to her?

agree karna this act was extrermely gross and disgusting uncalled for because i cant find a single reason for this behaviour of his

Quote

SweetRogue

@SweetRogue

Explorer

Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: MahaganduArjun

There is nothing wrong in exposing draupadi because karna's words were bitter but truth

This exposes your own cheap mentality

Quote

SweetRogue

@SweetRogue

Explorer

Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: MahaganduArjun

Do you mean that kunti was cheap who exposed draupadi by same rule?

"The woman having intercourse with four different men is called a Swairini (heanton), while she having intercourse with five becometh a harlot."

Women having intercourse with five is indeed wh**e and karna just repeated words of kunti.

There is a thing called 'context'. Though I do think it is too much for your pea brain so let me explain it to you. When Kunti said that to Pandu she was talking about Niyoga .i.e. Sex outside of marraige. Draupadi was MARRIED to all five of them. That rule doesn't apply to her. Otherwise the other women like Jatila who Yudhishtira gave as an example of polyandry would all have been harlots since they married seven and ten men if I remember correctly. One of these women was the mother of Prajapati Daksha. You think she was a harlot too?

Quote

1123225

Hibernated

Posted: 7 years ago

You know what the best part is?

They can call Panchali a wh**e, they can call Krishna a pimp, they can call Arjuna a coward, but they STILL don't have anything to camouflage the fact that Karna was a casteist sex-trafficker who offered his own wives and sons as slaves to his soldiers.

The supposed wh**e, the pimp, and the coward were still better people than Karna, and they still managed to kill that criminal.