Originally posted by: Alohomora
Whoever wrote this article seems to be following the wrong person. The news of his comeback was posted through the instagram ID "samthaanparth" whereas the "real" Parth's ID is "parthsamthaan". Either both the accounts r managed by Parth himself or the first one is a fake. Mostly I think that the one which the journalist followed, i.e. samthaanparth is fake because...
1. The tone of his msgs r different from the real one... sounds more "excited" and eager to mingle with others as compared to the parthsamthaan ID. The real Parth's msgs dont have that punch packed into it.
2. The fake "samthaanparth" follows the real Utkarsh, Veebha and Charlie but these people follow only "parthsamthaan"... not "samthaanparth". Surely... they know who the real one is...
3. The fake samthaan copies all of the real Parth's posts to cover up his identity and confuse people... but if u watch closely... his copied posts come up after the real one...
4. Both the Parth's dont follow Niti... nor does Niti follow any Parth (a technique used by the dupe to look real) cos the issue between Parth and Niti was quite a controversy. For those who have the urge to bash over the 4th point... trust me... I've got an explanation for that too... and its based on pure observation... not any baseless rumour.
I might be wrong.. but I feel that the person who spread this "comeback" news is an impostor for the above reasons. If I'm right, then... (1) the impostor needs to get a life and (2) the journalist needs to be wary about who he or she is tracking down before coming up with such articles.