rajjy needs to tone down a bit - Page 2

as much as i can see the smirk he gives is normal!! the prblm is we still have hritiks portrayal of akbar frm the movie in 2008 engraved in our mind and whenver we think of akbar we think of him as a good king with postive attitude and big heart a kind king!! but that was after 40 yrs of his life at his age 20 he was this cruel and ruthless!! so to portray him u need to give that smirk!! u may think it is OTT bt sometime smirk look OTT in real life also😆😆!! and well one thing i object with it is to show akbar negative ekta is crossing lines of decency man we all knew akbar was ruthless and cruel in his younger years that dsnt mean mughals under him looted temples or destroyed them or abducted woman in broad daylight to rape them!! to show him negative they are butchering the character of akbar in real life!! this i cannot accept!! u cannot a butcher a historical personality as large as akbar like this!!😡😡😡

but this evil smile of his looks very cute on him 😆

Originally posted by: pratsy

i lov his smirk...<3
i dnt want hm 2 change

i love his smirk
he is doing a fab job