In the finals Shamak point to Prachi and Sandhya
Round 1   ; ; ; 2   ; ; ; 3
Sandya 8   ; ; ;   ; ; ; 10 10
Prachi 9   ; ; ;   ; ; ; 9   ; ; ; 9
Total he gave Sandhya 28 and Prachi 27
Ok so he gave Prachi only 1 point less than Sandhya and in one dance he rated prachi better. Judges scores are 50% of the marks and the rest is public. From his marks is does not look like he thinks prachi is all that bad, so why is he going on every article and saying Prachi will only win for popularity. If he thinks Prachi has no talent he should give her lower marks. From the marks he has given it seems either is fine as the differnce is so tiny between the 2.
Last year Mona got 23 and Shweta 30 from the judges and that is a big difference. That is not the case this year. The cumulative differnce taking all the judges score between Prachi and Sandhya is only 1 point. You all can say Jeetandra is biased, but what does Shamaks and Urmila's scores for Prachi say. They are not telling the junta with their marks that Sandhya is so much better or anything. They are telling that both dancers are at par.