Originally posted by: *Woh Ajnabee*
But you should also take it into consideration that some posts will contain constructive criticism and some will not. If someone takes the time out to criticize a celebrity and explains their reasoning, you should consider those posts worth replying to and spend your time in a discussion there.
If today, I make a topic that says that Salman is ugly, I hate Ragini's smile, Mahi's laughter is irritating, Daya is too big and awkward, etc etc etc ... does that mean all the fans should automatically jump at once and provide long, detailed posts supporting their favorites? Obviously not. One, because its simply an opinion. And two, because there is nothing here to discuss or debate.
Yes, one should criticize in a proper manner. But if one fails to do that, people responding should also use some intellect on their part and decide which posts are worth their time and which ones are not.
if its constructive critisim, mostly likely you'll find her fans first (not that others cant/wont). i didnt like her last performance ( based on choreo, concept etc) and i stated that! some people agreed with me and didnt. at the end of the day, constructive critism is just personal opinion!. another reason WHY HER FANS ARE JUMPING IN is because the topic starter gives an one liner and others state their "sources", so we fans just counter agrue with help of evidence from SBS,SBB, house arrest etc. many judge her from JDJ, we fans say, "hey checkout, her other interviews, proof of evidence otherwise).
so when we give detailed posts, its because, we have something to say !
if anyone posts anything negative about looks, firstly its against IF rules, secondly thats stupid!
but if someone posts (like this one, about her attititude) her fans, will respond back! I am her fan, and i am first to say she isnt perfect, but if such a topic (similar to this comes in, without credible sources) then fans will JUMP IN and PROVIDE LONG POSTS!
Bade Achhe Lagte Hain
CID
Book Talk
