DOES AA 'LOVE' MONA? - Page 8

Created

Last reply

Replies

87

Views

4.3k

Users

32

Frequent Posters

tina59 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 19 years ago
#71

I think we are missing the whole point here,I am not at all talking about love here .He loves HIS wife and thats clear and confirmed.

Now in the some interview ,SS had given a really weird answer to longetivity of marriage ,in which she said that for that one has to resist the attraction of the opposite sex and stay comitted and be professional and know the difference between personal and professional thats exactly what i am saying

i will try to get that answer of hers ,but it was very weird for her to give an answer like that

even vikas bhalla said that people working long hours with the opposite attractive sex tends to get sttracted and it happens with many stars and its very easy to get carried away

thats exactly what I want to say that its possible that at some point of time,aa and ms may have had some attraction/feelings for each other which was more than friendship.

I have no doubt that this happened with apu and mona as well and theirs is a mystery and its magical 😳

Edited by tina59 - 19 years ago
insouciance thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 19 years ago
#72
no tina..even i agree that they might be attracted to eack other at times..afterall AA is arguably the most good lookign man in tellywood and there are many people (including AA) who find mona prety and attractive.....so that attraction will be there...........but the topic was does AA love mona....and the answer is NO...he does not love her....
jprasad thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 19 years ago
#73

Originally posted by: Buffie

no tina..even i agree that they might be attracted to eack other at times..afterall AA is arguably the most good lookign man in tellywood and there are many people (including AA) who find mona prety and attractive.....so that attraction will be there...........but the topic was does AA love mona....and the answer is NO...he does not love her....



He doesn't love SA and he doesn't MS. He loves JP and one of these days we are gonna go off to the moon.
Dimdim thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 19 years ago
#74
Oh my 😆god.. JP so funny had to laff at your statement. 😉
@di_g thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#75

Originally posted by: jprasad





😆 😆 good one!
He doesn't love SA and he doesn't MS. He loves JP and one of these days we are gonna go off to the moon.

blyton thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#76

Originally posted by: NKSUDHIR

Blyton, your analysis were very well written on MandA and AS love feelings. We don't know how much he loves his wife but it was him who proposed her and he keep on saying in his interviews what he likes about Shilpa. No matter what, he does love Shilpa a lot but that doesn't stop his feelings for Mona because there is love beyond your FIRST LOVE and which one you prefer more all depends on an individual how he wants to handle this in his/her life. As long as love doesn't interfere in your family life and intentionally it is not hurting anybody's feelings, it is OK to love. But it is not called Extra Marital Relationship. EMR is a BIG word, which we should not use for someone like Apurva and Mona.
Another thing I wanted to tell you BLYTON was that Radha Krishna Love story is not an Extra Marital Relationship.I was surprised that smart girl like you can use those words for LORD KRISHNA. HIS main purpose to come in this world as a HUMAB BEING was to kill the EVIL CREATURES like Kans and teach people how to love each other. How can it be an EXTRA MARITAL relationship; when Radha was her childhood friend and he did expain it to Radha that he will get married to Rukmani because his parents had chosen Rukmani.
LOVE demands sacrifice, separation, devotion for each other. It does not teach you," divorce your spuose and live with me" attitude. Separation is the time when you really finds out WHAT TRUE LOVE IS ALL ABOUT. When you do something for your LOVED ONES, the feeling of satisfaction can only be described by the person experiencing it LOVE does not end with separation, it starts with separation.
AA and MS liking each other means that they will be BEST FRIENDS for ever and wish for each others happiness and MS knows AA's happiness lies in his family. Another thing that if they will be happy with each others' success when they are not together can tell how much they appreciate their friendship.
I hope you didn't mind BLYTON that I didn't like you saying something negative about Radha Krishna LOVE. HE is the one who taught me how to love. HE cannot be wrong. Thats all for now.

Neelam di, i did not use the phrase EMR for Radha-Krishna. fan no 1 jjkn used it and i simply quoted her post in my reply. And i don't think her intention was to degrade Lord Krishna--maybe she couldn't find the right words in the heat of the discussion.

I am not saying MandA are like radha-Krishna. I know the latter's love was beyond human understanding--it was based on the Spirit and not on the senses. One can in no way compare today's EMRs to them. I have no intention of hurting your feelings regarding this--i respect them immensely.
But yes, if i have to think of love existing outside marriage, it is Radha-Krishna whom i think of as the IDEAL. What i mean is that, even if we as humans have not reached that level of divinity, we should strive to emulate that ideal. If i am in a situation like MandA, then i should keep my love pure by remembering the purity of Radha-Krishna's love. That would mean loving the person all one's life and praying for his welfare, but also faithfully discharging my duties towards my family and my spouse, if i have one.

blyton thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#77

Originally posted by: Dimdim

Blython says "I think some of us are uncomfortable with this idea beacuse we have been conditioned to believe that love between a man and woman can exist only within marriage. But just as two people who are married may not always love each other (or there wouldn't be so many divorces), so two people who love each other need not be married.

Loving someone other than your spouse is not wrong, because love is the purest of feelings. If love is pure how can it be a sin? The danger lies in rushing into an extramarital relationship and being unfair to your spouse. And AA is never going to do that. Both AA and MS know how to keep their feelings under check. And as Neelam di says, its better that they remain true friends rather than extra-marital lovers. Unquote....

Hey Blyton,
I was just reading your post about AA and MS.
I disagree with the " Loving someone other than your spouse is not wrong, because love is the purest of feelings".
My thoughts are it is wrong, after marriage or in marriage one is committed to his / her spouse. There shouldn't be any other kind of LOVE( ROMANTIC LOVE) in this case specially for a SINGLE person of the opposite sex.

Well to me it seems like EMOTIONAL BETRAYAL. As a married lady I am not/will not be able to accept/ this in a relationship.

If a husband who is very much married to his wife is also in LOVE with another single woman. I suggest they call it quits. Its unfair to the other spouse.


In marriage the relationship between spouses is based upon TRUST, Fidelity and Love. If any of this element is missing . The marriage fails . Its a question of time.

I think its equivalent to cheating your spouse. Until and unless the marriage is already on the ROCKS before the arrival of the other person.

The key of marriage is the COMMITMENT between two consenting adults for emotional, physical, mental,companionship and ofcourse procreation.

Please don't be offended these are just my thoughts..

Dimdim

Dimdim, i am not offended, but i think you may have missed my point.
What i am saying is, if one falls in love with someone other than his spouse, then he should not betray his spouse by having a relationship outside marriage. But then he shouldn't kill himself with guilt, either. So many ppl fall in love before marriage but are not always able to marry the person they love. After marriage they may adjust well and even fall in love with their spouses, but does that mean they should kill their past feelings? How can one forget someone one has ever loved?

Acting on romantic feelings outside marriage IS wrong, unless, as Buffie has pointed out, there is nothing left in the marriage. But i really do not understand what is wrong with remaining friends with the person you love and wishing always for their welfare.

Since i'm not married, my ideas may be a little naive. After marriage, who knows, i might think differently. But right now, i completely believe in what i am saying. If you feel differently, i respect your opinion. This is a very sensitive subject, so we should not force our views upon one another.

Dimdim thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 19 years ago
#78
Yes Blyton. I did miss your point.
I am in agreement with the post. Thanks

Dimdim
NKSUDHIR thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#79

Originally posted by: blyton

Neelam di, i did not use the phrase EMR for Radha-Krishna. fan no 1 jjkn used it and i simply quoted her post in my reply. And i don't think her intention was to degrade Lord Krishna--maybe she couldn't find the right words in the heat of the discussion.

I am not saying MandA are like radha-Krishna. I know the latter's love was beyond human understanding--it was based on the Spirit and not on the senses. One can in no way compare today's EMRs to them. I have no intention of hurting your feelings regarding this--i respect them immensely.
But yes, if i have to think of love existing outside marriage, it is Radha-Krishna whom i think of as the IDEAL. What i mean is that, even if we as humans have not reached that level of divinity, we should strive to emulate that ideal. If i am in a situation like MandA, then i should keep my love pure by remembering the purity of Radha-Krishna's love. That would mean loving the person all one's life and praying for his welfare, but also faithfully discharging my duties towards my family and my spouse, if i have one.

I am glad that you understand the deepness of Radha Krishna Love. Sorry, I thought you also think like other people. I learned a lot from Krishna Leela; I don't like anyone saying something wrong about him. I went to California last month and my Uncle started talking against Radha Krishna's love story that it is sending wrong message to people. I didn't had enough time to argue with him about Krishnaji story. Even if I did he wouldn't have understood because he is RADHASWAMI and they don't even believe in our Hindu religion. When I know people wouldn't understand me, I try to stay away from argument but friends like you, we can discuus any issues.

Going back to LOVE, Even when we are married, we do love so many people in the world, but that love is totally different than Husband -Wife's relationship. As long as you don't have LIVING IN relationship with someone, its ok to ADMIRE someone more than others. LOVE is beyond your control, but staying in the LIMITS is within your control. There is a WORLD BEYOND HUSBAND AND WIFE and staying in that world is not a SIN.

indiainspires thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#80
hi every1!

2day the same paper 'etc' frm which last week i had reported news about j losing child has a cover-story on telly couples---telly stars falling in love with their colleagues-never mind what characters they play (like om of kahani married the 1 who played his sis on screen).

parmeet says " An actor's life is very insecure.only an actor can understand wat the other is going thru..v can let out our frustrations ranging frm troubling co-stars 2 everytng else.. even if i got a 2nd chance i wud marry archana only."
sm1 called Kirti Gaekwad-of Sindoor tere naam ka fame - says " its' very normal for tv actors 2 fall in love wid each other.bcoz most time is spent on the sets and there is not much of a personal life or a family life. so u tend to get drawn to someone from your second family, that's sm1 frm the sets."

Quoting the paper=
"So, the conclusion is that it's the time spent 2gether which make two ppl realise they wud b better off being 2gether forever."
and basically all actors telling how its good for them 2 have partners frm same profession bcoz they hv long working hours/irrational schedules.etc etc.. they hv written abt evr couple v usu see//parmeet /varun/manav/shakti/sachin/mihir/om/yash tonk/hiten/rajiv paul/many others..how they met or smthng abt them..
Abt AA- SS-just 1 sentence-(Quote) "And there is also Rohit Roy and Manasi Joshi Roy and Apoorva Agnihotri and Shila Saklani.And the list just goes on and on and on."

they also mention abt '2-be'couples like amit/neeru & abt speculation on Aamna-Rajeev and Karan-Mona's relation.(Quote)
"the same goes for the on-and off-pairing of MS and KO, costars in JJKN. At times they talk abt each other and at times they choose to ignore each other in parties. guess its' upto their mood swings."

source--the telegraph--
sorry for not writing in complete words as lots to be done. just thought wud share this wid u all

bye!

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".