Why?

Why do you think Ragini chose to separate the kids. I understand at that time she might have felt that she has move away from Neil, but separating the children from their father and herself is a huge decision. I think they is more to the story. Please write your opinions

She is as egoistic as Neil and both are hot tempered and possessive. She must have done this deal business so that she doesn't loose custody of all to Neil.

Originally posted by: DiscoDhokla

She is as egoistic as Neil and both are hot tempered and possessive. She must have done this deal business so that she doesn't loose custody of all to Neil.

so far your prediction seems correct, but after her emotional hug Agam I feel like she was forced to do this

Originally posted by: DiscoDhokla

She is as egoistic as Neil and both are hot tempered and possessive. She must have done this deal business so that she doesn't loose custody of all to Neil.

Originally posted by: beautiful1

Yeah, i agree with you. Remember in the episode where NeiRa meet. Neil takes her to stay away from his kids cos otherwise he'll claim his right on Nishi and Aarav and she wouldn't be able to "afford" it - don't know whether he meant it would cost her a lot or he was talking about the pain he could inflict her. But nonetheless, I think Ragini was left with either the division of the children and both getting two each or having none because she was financially unstable whereas Neil was not and usually the children's custody goes to the parent who can afford to fulfill the children's need.

i guess its something to do with custody and she had no choice but forced to take a decision

Originally posted by: DazzilerDizzy

I think both were forced to take the decision! I think Pam had something to do with this!

Financial state must have been a strong factor behind this decision. But the chief reason has to be bigger.

Originally posted by: DazzilerDizzy

I think both were forced to take the decision! I think Pam had something to do with this!