[NOTD] News Of The Day - 01/07/2007

271043 thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#1

Harry Potter is not magic for everybody



As the boy wizard casts his sales spell for Bloomsbury again, other publishers - and many booksellers - are outside the charmed circle, says Zoe Wood

Sunday July 1, 2007
The Observer


Evil appeared to be prevailing at the end of the last Harry Potter novel with a clutch of main characters dead and the teenage wizard hell-bent on revenge. But while fans are counting down the hours to discover if Potter meets a grisly end at the hands of Lord Voldemort, high-street retailers and publishers are wrestling their own demons. Publishers argue that there can be no happy ending as the Potter saga highlights a new sales dynamic which is destroying their industry, with a small number of blockbuster titles sold at a heavy discount through supermarkets and over the net. They are worried about the clout of Tesco as well as Waterstone's, which bought rival Ottakar's last year, and how to respond to demand for digital content.

'Our main concern is that shopping habits are changing,' says one senior executive. 'The supermarket offer is concentrated on the bestseller list, which means a limited range of books sell an awful lot more than anything else, usually at half the cover price.'

The might of the supermarkets and ascendance of Amazon is also making life difficult for booksellers, with high-street sales estimated to be down almost 2 per cent so far this year, though the overall market is in growth. The tough sales climate is supported by Waterstone's decision to retrench, Borders' plans to offload its UK division, as well as problems at Fopp, which has gone into receivership. Indeed, despite the expected sales bonanza, HSBC analyst Paul Smiddy says Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows will amount to a 'black hole' in summer trade when it goes on sale on 21 July. The majority of booksellers will lose money on the title as they try to match the aggressive pricing of Tesco, Asda and Amazon, while no sensible rival publisher would dare launch a decent title against it, he says. Most retailers accept that only Bloomsbury and JK Rowling will profit from Harry Potter. 'I don't think retailers will make any money, when you take account of the stunts and midnight openings,' says Neil Dewsbury, commercial director at Waterstone's. But although the chain is selling the book at half price for 8.99, he still believes it creates a massive opportunity. Internet pre-orders are 100 per cent ahead of Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince But even for Bloomsbury the joy could be shortlived. The series is supposed to end here, and in the absence of Potter magic its profits crashed by nearly 75 per cent last year. To fill the void it has been bandying around 2m advances to the likes of cookery writer Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall, earning the soubriquet of the 'Roman Abramovich of publishing'. So just as Tesco looms large in retail, the publishing industry is also polarising, says Smiddy: 'Big outfits are doing OK, as are the boutiques, but those in the middle are suffering, because to participate they have to put big advances up for books by B-list celebrities or politicians' memoirs.' But supermarkets would argue they are the consumer champion - books have never been cheaper. They are helping publishers grow the cake, reaching a younger, female readership with good-natured romps penned by the likes of Katie Price (aka Jordan) and Chantelle. But insiders argue that cheap books come at a cost, albeit a cultural one, with areas such as serious non-fiction in decline. Dewsbury rebuts the charge that its centralised processes and publisher-funded '3 for 2' promotions are damaging the industry, arguing that diluting Waterstone's offer would be 'commercial suicide. Our ambition is to sell a great range of books. There are new titles coming out daily, from serious literary fiction to children's books. The customer has never had it so good'. But just as Waterstone's is berated for bowing to the mass market, the big publishers are accused of cutting lists, leaving it to small publishing houses to pick up books for small advances. Whether the level of depression among publishers, often considered a gloomy lot, is higher than normal is difficult to gauge. Andrew Franklin, managing director of Profile Books which struck gold with Eats, Shoots & Leaves by Lynne Truss, says publishers are 'always complaining - I don't think things are too bad.' A supermarket will stock about 250 titles against up to 25,000 in a specialist bookshop and Franklin worries their power could make it harder to find a platform for edgier material: 'Making a new lesbian author work at a commercial level could get difficult if the supermarkets shy away.' Joel Rickett, deputy editor of the Bookseller, is optimistic, pointing out the total market is registering growth, albeit in volume rather than value sales. 'The actual sale of printed books continues to rise, and by our rolling measure the market is 3 per cent up over the past 12 months,' he says. However, he concedes times are changing: 'Sales of the top 100 books continue to rise, and big publishers continue to take market share. As a result, you have a longer tail of books selling in ever smaller numbers. But there are still more books in a branch of Waterstone's than you could read in your lifetime.' Commentary: fear the revolution In 1977, your average Martian visiting a typical British bookshop would have concluded that whatever these stores were selling must be something shameful, marginal, and of limited interest to earthlings. Bookshops were inhospitable, badly lit and poorly stocked. New books mostly had to be ordered, a tedious process that might take six weeks. Even when, or if, they turned up, the new books themselves were hardly more appetising. Almost every new publication appeared first in hardback, in a dowdy-looking jacket, closely printed in some bog-standard font on inferior paper. One word summed up the world of books: 'dingy'. Today the transformation seems comprehensive: bright, appealing shops; almost instant delivery; attractive hard and paperback books piled high on all sides. It's like a comparison between David Cameron and Jim Callaghan. And yet, if you talk to a contemporary publisher you will hear only apocalyptic expressions of doom and gloom. Last week alone, no fewer than three senior figures in the British book trade confided to me their despair at the trading conditions in which they were forced to operate. Part of this, of course, is the British publishers' conversational default position. Like farmers, they are never happier than when complaining about the state of their crops and the barrenness of their parched acres. But that's not the whole story. Objectively, there are good grounds for saying the traditional book business faces a near-terminal crisis. This may well be a golden age for readers and writers in the English-speaking world, but at the same time the book industry is in the midst of the biggest IT revolution since Gutenberg and Caxton. The Google library initiative and the internet as a whole offer mind-bending opportunities to entrepreneurs in the information business, but they confront traditional publishers with some apparently mortal threats as well. In addition to the technological challenge of the IT revolution (a book after all is just another, more ancient 'delivery system'), there are the unquestionably worsening terms of trade, the shaving of margins, and the incipient gangsterism of the book chains. Since the abolition of the Net Book Agreement in 1997 the transformation of the bookshops has been bought at a cost: a highly visible minority of books sell very well indeed, and probably better than ever, while the majority struggle to perform. The profits from fewer and fewer mega-selling titles are required, more than ever before, to carry the losses sustained by the rest of the list. Inexplicably, this crisis is exacerbated by astounding overproduction. As recently as 10 years ago, there were approximately 100,000 new titles published each year in the UK. Today, that figure is nudging close to 200,000. Pro rata, this outstrips new book production in America, the EU, and every other book market in the developed world.

Simultaneously, the research and development of an electronic reader (an 'iPod for books') is on the brink of threatening the traditional book with overnight redundancy. Industry analysts look nervously at the transformation of the music business, and wonder when a similar revolution will strike the print world. The short answer is, in the words of Hollywood scriptwriter William Goldman: no one knows anything.

< = =text/>

Created

Last reply

Replies

2

Views

581

Users

1

Likes

1

Frequent Posters

271043 thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#2

Chapter and verse

CHITRA RAMASWAMY

IT'S hard not to begin with numbers when meditating on the ever-expanding beast that is the Harry Potter phenomenon. Type 'Harry Potter' into Google, for instance, and you get 80,500,000 hits, roughly eight million more than if you replace the boy wizard with the original franchise, Star Wars. Potter's creator gets more hits than Jane Austen, though thankfully still a good deal fewer than William Shakespeare.

In fact, the rise and rise of Harry Potter since its humble beginnings 10 years ago is a tale of almost Shakespearean proportions, and arguably one more interesting than the books themselves.

The six in the series so far have sold more than 325 million copies and been translated into 63 languages. There have been hugely successful films, video games, merchandise, a theme park, and a set of Royal Mail stamps are on the way, while an asteroid, dinosaur and, erm, housing development have been named in either JK Rowling's or her creation's honour. In the midst of all this, Rowling has become the richest writer in literary history.

And so we await, some with bated breath, others with yawns, the fate of Harry, his Hogwarts brethren and Rowling herself. Approximately 30 seconds after the stroke of midnight on July 21, Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows will start magicking itself out of shops quicker than you can say "muggles are mad", and we will be left wondering exactly how one writer and a series of children's books managed to change so much. Here are just some of the markers of the Potter effect.

THE WAY WE READ NOW

Before Harry realised the dark portents of a certain scar on his forehead and got a coveted ticket to the best boarding school in Britain, life was markedly different. Kids were more likely to become wizards than pick up a book, and grown-ups wouldn't be seen dead with a copy of Enid Blyton's Malory Towers.

Then a single mother wrote a novel in various Edinburgh cafes, added a middle initial to her name so young boys wouldn't be put off by her gender, and in 1997 Harry Potter And The Philosopher's Stone was published by Bloomsbury.

Fast forward to 2007 and now, when children's books come out, there are less colourful and slicker editions marketed specifically to adults. The new consumers of little people's entertainment are big people. It has become de rigueur for grown-ups to froth at the mouth at the upcoming film version of Philip Pullman's Dark Materials trilogy, to buy Shrek merchandise and, of course, to read Potter. On the flip side, novelists who normally write for adults are hitching a ride too, with Jeanette Winterson and Nick Hornby just two examples who are turning their hands to writing for children.

As for whether Rowling really is responsible for persuading children to read with her series of dark, ever-so-British fantasies - as Gordon Brown claims - or whether it's a combination of clever marketing and rehashed, conservative twaddle - as writers including AS Byatt and Harold Bloom contend - the jury is still out.

THE BUSINESS OF BOOKS

Never before has there been such a success story as the Harry Potter franchise. BP, as in Before Potter, would we even have referred to a book as a franchise? The series even led to the reformation of the New York Times Bestseller List in 2000, when a separate children's list was created because Rowling's books were clogging up the grown-up one.

If anyone is more thrilled about all this than Rowling, it's the bigwigs at Bloomsbury. The publication of a Potter is now beyond the scale of a blockbuster release and the whole of July has more or less been cleared for The Deathly Hallows, such is the acceptance that no other book would want to go up against this bruiser. Shakespeare himself would probably wait until August.

These days, publishers are desperate to find the 'next' Potter and the latest hot tip is Tunnels, a fantasy by Roderick Gordon and Brian Williams. Get this for the Rowling effect: the pre-publication rights for Tunnels have already been sold in 15 languages, advances of over 500,000 have been amassed, and there is a major Hollywood film deal in the pipeline.

In other words, forget the slow burn of Harry Potter and all the dog-eared books that become popular over time and through word of mouth. These days the publishing world serves 'literary classics' up fast, in multiple formats, and the bookshops open overnight to sell them to us.

THE WOMAN BEHIND THE WIZARD

What of the woman herself? A 41-year-old married mother of three children who has adopted Scotland as her home and has a house in the Merchiston area of Edinburgh, one near Aberfeldy and another in London, Rowling has taken on an almost mythical status over the years. This is no doubt thanks to her shielding of her private life, her friendships with the likes of Gordon and Sarah Brown, and her canny use of the internet to speak directly to her fans. Even today, it is rare for authors to have their own websites.

Rowling has arguably changed the way writers are seen and how they operate, and today they are more and more drawn into the cult of celebrity and more aggressively marketed by their publishers. Yet, 10 years on, we still know remarkably little about the woman behind Harry, aside, that is, from what she wants us to know.

We know she is the second richest female entertainer in the world after Oprah Winfrey. We know about her substantial charity contributions, particularly to the research and treatment of MS (her mother died of multiple sclerosis as Rowling was writing the first Potter ). Beyond that, we can only watch the films, get on the blogs, join the super-fans, or, come July 21, head for the bookshops. v

Edited by ~*Thamizhan*~ - 18 years ago
271043 thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#3

Still under the spell

JAMES MOTTRAM

HERE'S magic in the air the day I arrive at Leavesden Studios, the home of the Harry Potter films. In the canteen, a cordoned off section is filled with balloons, a table of presents and a banner that reads "Happy Birthday, Rupert".

Of course, it's for the red-haired Rupert Grint, who plays Potter's best friend Ron Weasley. He has just turned 18, a rite of passage for any teenager but particularly if you've spent all those years in a former Rolls-Royce factory north of Watford working on a film franchise as big as this one. "There's definitely a family atmosphere here," says Grint, a big grin on his face as he unwraps his gifts.

Emma Watson, who plays Ron and Harry's chum Hermione Granger, looks close to tears. "I'm a bit emotional today," she says. "Rupert's 18! I can't believe it." She tells me she bought him two Mambo T-shirts, which she forced the shop assistant to try on to check the size. Yet she also has cause to celebrate. The week we meet - during the filming of the forthcoming fifth instalment, Harry Potter And The Order Of The Phoenix - she has just received her GCSE results, which she passed with a flurry of Grade As. "I'm so chuffed," she giggles. "I'm over the moon."

It's no surprise that working on the Potter films is like belonging to a second family. While directors have changed, the cast and the key crew members have stayed the same since the first film, Harry Potter And The Philosopher's Stone, was shot back in 2000. Watson, Grint and, of course, Daniel Radcliffe, who plays Harry, have grown up together on these films. "Sometimes, I'll go to a friend's house and their little brothers and sisters will be playing the first film on DVD and it's very strange," admits Watson. "It's like your baby pictures but a whole film of it. I look so different."

Earlier in the year, reports had it that Watson was set to quit after the fifth film, a rumour that has since been strongly denied by backers Warner Brothers. After the first four films collectively grossed a staggering $1.1bn at the US box office, the studio is understandably keen to keep their popular cast intact. Indeed, while everyone here does their best to suggest working on Potter is a blast - a notice on the wall even advertises the annual Harry Potter golf tournament - as Hollywood executives buzz about in motorised carts around this vast warehouse-like complex, there is something rather military about the whole operation.

Marshalled by British producer David Heyman ever since he wisely snapped up the rights to JK Rowling's books, you half expect to see his army of crew members practising square-bashing in their spare time. As any campaign dictates, supplies need to be nearby: hence wardrobe, with its rows of polythene-protected costumes on hangers, has a rather makeshift feel to it, not too far from the main sets. Meanwhile, the bunker holding various creature models, including the creepy giant spider from Harry Potter And The Chamber of Secrets guarding the doorway, is nestled much further out of the main building.

As we go on set, in a scene that sees Harry arrive at Grimmauld Place to receive vital information from the so-called Order of the Phoenix, it's the perfect example of why the Potter films have endured.

"What's beautiful about today is that you have a room full of, in my opinion, some of the finest actors in the world, in one scene," explains director David Yates, who is on his first Potter tour of duty. And as David Thewlis and Gary Oldman pass me by, deep in conversation, while Brendan Gleeson, in full costume as the visually challenged 'Mad Eye' Moody, and Julie Walters loiter in the background, it's hard to disagree.

Yet while it's easy enough to swoop up the "crme de la crme of British acting talent" as Watson calls them - including new additions Helena Bonham Carter and Imelda Staunton - where the Potter films have played it smart is in regularly drafting in new directors. Certainly, bringing in the Mexican Alfonso Cuarn for Harry Potter And The Prisoner Of Azkaban, by far the darkest of the series to date, was a stroke of genius.

Likewise Yates, who has since signed on for the next episode, Harry Potter And The Half-Blood Prince, comes from a background in hard-hitting television dramas such as Sex Traffic.

"This film, I think, will be a little darker than the last one," he promises.

With Harry's nemesis, the evil Lord Voldemort (frighteningly played by Ralph Fiennes) growing in power, this fifth film promises to be the most adult yet. As Radcliffe reports, he and Yates went to see a bereavement counsellor to ask some questions about how people deal with the death of loved ones.

"Thankfully, I've never been bereaved, so it was very useful for me, rather than dragging those emotions out of nowhere. There's a wonderful line in one of the books that says: 'What cannot be avoided must be accepted.' And it's quite true. In a way, death is the hardest of things to face up to, even for Harry, who has experienced a lot of it in his life."

Still, it's not all doom and gloom, as Harry finally plucks up the courage to kiss his beloved girl Cho (played by the Motherwell-born Katie Leung, see page 6), though when we meet, Radcliffe has yet to film the scene. "I don't think it should look like either of them are good kissers or either of them are natural," he muses. "It should look tender and innocent and quite endearing, and hopefully it will."

It's little wonder then that Yates believes that the Potter franchise hones in on "probably the most dramatic time of your life", a time when "you're discovering the opposite sex, and how complicated you are and how complicated the world can be".

Already Radcliffe, who turns 18 this month, has been discovering this, notably with his recent celebrated performance as the disturbed Alan Strang in Peter Shaffer's play Equus, which has taken London's West End by storm. "The earlier you start, the more likely you are to be able to get people to see you as something else, rather than just as one character," he says. With only two Potter films left to make, he knows his time as the boy wizard is coming to an end. "It will be very strange, but it will be quite liberating in a way," he admits. "If there were going to be an infinite number of Harry Potters, I don't think I could do it. It's nice, knowing that there's seven. I've always thought that's a definite goal to try and hit."

With Watson, Grint and Radcliffe on the verge of adulthood, it seems rather apt that their characters are maturing in the same way. "They're all growing up now," reflects Grint, who also branched out in his first adult role in last year's Driving Lessons.

Still, the child in them all has yet to be extinguished by the demands of the Hollywood dream factory. "I know it's not cool to be enthusiastic about things, but I can't help it," gushes Radcliffe. "I was never particularly good at anything at school. I got by. So when I came here, I found something I'm good at."

Harry Potter And The Order Of The Phoenix opens July 13 v

Edited by ~*Thamizhan*~ - 18 years ago

Related Topics

Harry Potter thumbnail

Posted by: Quantum-Dot · 11 months ago

Hello fellow Potterheads!⚡ Exciting times ahead in the Wizarding World! As many of you have heard, HBO has officially announced a brand-new...

Expand ▼
Harry Potter thumbnail

Posted by: minakrish · 4 months ago

⚡ Happy International Harry Potter Day!🧙‍♂️✨

Happy International Harry Potter Day Today, 2nd May — we celebrate the magical world that gave us spells, friendships, bravery, and...

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".