A little conflict here... Help please..! - Page 2

@TM

Originally posted by: kunataanya

of course it wasn't nice.. he was angry... people aren't usually nice when they are angry are they?? 😆 and he's human.. if there's something which makes him angry he will retaliate... it's natural...

He's a humaan ! *annoyed expression*

Originally posted by: RainNshine

He's a humaan ! *annoyed expression*

i tend to forget that. LOL.

I joke.

But You know, what's better than to ignore those hurtful comments? Why let them take you down? :/

someone intelligent has once said.. "Ignorance is bliss!"

Originally posted by: Rituparnaa

@TM

This only I wrote to give an example.If NT is not meant there in her stmt then why so much fuss abt GC's lines which he never meant also?We know all what a good person he is.And poor guy is so much hurt.Leave him with his peace of mind abt his personal stuff at least!

Right now, i can't seem to think of anything to reply to your comment because i found one of the comments on this topic very useful. And i was really wrongly interpreting it. I'm not ashamed to say it 😆

Originally posted by: kunataanya

lol.. we do tend to forget that about our fav celebrities don't we? 😆

Well, that is the problem innit? 🤣

No no yaar, that was not for DD, he was just giving an example that agar humme uss ka dog accha nahi laga aur hum usse kisi gali ke stray dog ke saath pair karenge to he can't just do that. He's just trying to say that he can't just be with anyone.

Originally posted by: robbieluvr

No no yaar, that was not for DD, he was just giving an example that agar humme uss ka dog accha nahi laga aur hum usse kisi gali ke stray dog ke saath pair karenge to he can't just do that. He's just trying to say that he can't just be with anyone.

Thankyou for clearing it out... ! :) appreciated!

Originally posted by: sksg

Your quote is only a part of the whole sentence, and the sentence used is an allegory; i.e. it is just one concrete example of an abstract point, and hence, it can not be used to equate two unrelated examples just because they satisfy the same abstract notion. For example, if you say Day is to Night as Life is to Death, it does not mean that day = life and night = death. It just means that the abstract relationship implied between day and night is same as that implied between life and death. So, there is nothing I find in English language construct or grammar that supports your interpretation of equating DD to dog. It is your interpretation, but not what is implied by the sentence used.

As always Sri ... u put it right ... infact was waiting for u to comment 😉