Suresh Modi/Majesh Ajmera which one. - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

20

Views

2.5k

Users

10

Likes

25

Frequent Posters

DiscoDhokla thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: millee18

i think the cvs have planned this track in haste ... thts why leaving so many loop holes ! but if they want to show this track they need to make it impactful !


I too feel the same.. There are many hits and misses
Ms.SK thumbnail
Deal or No Deal Thumbnail Screen Detective Participant Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 11 years ago
#12
The fact of the matter is Suresh/mahesh married Pallavi first. So when he was getting married to Sharda, personally it was his second marriage.
.
CV's after few twists and turns will declare Pallavi's marriage is not valid as she is married to someone whose identity is not real.
Sharada will legally be his wife as Suresh Modi is his real name.
A.A.5898 thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: Ms.S.K.

The fact of the matter is Suresh/mahesh married Pallavi first. So when he was getting married to Sharda, personally it was his second marriage.

.
CV's after few twists and turns will declare Pallavi's marriage is not valid as she is married to someone whose identity is not real.
Sharada will legally be his wife as Suresh Modi is his real name.



That's exactly how it's going to end up being. After all it is an Indian drama. 😆
ek_aarzoo thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#14
I don't want Sharda to accept Suresh or whatever his name is EVER! If she does then I think that the show is setting a BAD example
souroj thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: u4tlu

Pallavi is married to Mahesh Ajmera. The surety with which she throws the marriage certificate at Sharda it makes me think that Suresh actually might have changed his name to Mahesh Ajmera. That makes his marriage to Pallavi legal. And that makes his existence as Suresh Modi very illegal. May be that is why he has all his companies in Sharda's name. and takes her thumb print all the time.

Either way one name is illegal. dual identity is a criminal offence. Does not hold good. at any place in the world


Agreed, He must have legally changed his name to Mahesh Ajmera n his one n legal wife is Pallavi. That is why he never bothered to complete his marriage with Sharda n never tried to educate her n confined her within the 4 walls of the house.
It's still a mystery that Pallavi did not know anything abt Suresh Modi. Anyway if Sak's friends cud not recognize Aditya, then we have to accept that Pallavi knows nothing abt Suresh Modi.

I don't think Pallavi forgave Suresh,she did not meet him, she just gave it back to Sharda for insulting her.
Edited by souroj - 11 years ago
souroj thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#16

Originally posted by: A.A.5898

All of you have a point. I feel like CVs didnt think it through all the way. This why tere is so much confusion.
@bystander: they probably did show Sharda's own sari textiles track on purpose like you said.

@bystander and u4tlu: suresh changing his name is very likely. However, someone needs to give him a reality check. So if he did change his name then he is LEGALLY Mahesh Ajmera. How proudly the idiot says to Karan "yeh mera ghar hai Suresh Modi ka ghar". But wait a minute, there is no Suresh Modi, only Mahesh Ajmera. So whatever he is claiming as his is LEGALLY not his at all. All of which he claims is his is in reality Sharda's. I realized that when Pallavi's says something to Karan when she comes with the certificate. I don't remember what she said but it had something to do with the name and stuff.

All of this really is leading me to believe that the CVs didnt do their homework.


When Karan asked her what has she come to take she tells him sarcastically that they have nothing to give her coz their name also does not belong to them.
Only Karan said he will send his dad to jail, others did not tell anything😕, they did not even question Suresh😕.
avanibhavesh thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#17
hold on .. what is legal? if suresh modi was illegal.. wouldnt dadi question that? coz dadi would be modi aswell. Mahesh ajmera if is the new acquired name then suresh/mahesh wont be dadi's son therefore no relation to the property and the family.. this all is so confusing.. hahah the bloopers are confusing us
story pieces are not falling in place.

u4tlu thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#18

Originally posted by: avanibhavesh

hold on .. what is legal? if suresh modi was illegal.. wouldnt dadi question that? coz dadi would be modi aswell. Mahesh ajmera if is the new acquired name then suresh/mahesh wont be dadi's son therefore no relation to the property and the family.. this all is so confusing.. hahah the bloopers are confusing us

story pieces are not falling in place.


Of course Suresh Modi is Suresh Modi to start with like when he was "born". But now Mahesh Ajmera is married to Pallavi. So legally the marriage is not with Suresh Modi and Pallavi Ajmera. unless Suresh legally changed his name to Mahesh Ajmera. in whch case Suresh Modi will be punished for marrying Sharda using false or mistaken identity and Sharda and the kids will be compensated for being the victim of fraud. They can go to court at any time. Rather than "burning" her marriage photos Sharda should have kept them and gone to court taken a lawyer and asked for justice. She spent years of her life serving a man whose name even does not belong to him. she thought he was her husband and had three kids through him. For this only Suresh Modi is responsible and Sharda and kids will be compensated. why should they leave the house penniless? Till the previous day Sharda served her husband right? She has a right everywhere. in house and on his property. or else she will be compensated for being the victim of fraud. It is clear and there need not be any drama about it. Why do they come up with such stupid ideas which are not even correct?
DiscoDhokla thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#19
Jo pallavi ne kiya woh technically sharda ne karna chahiye tha😵
A.A.5898 thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#20

Originally posted by: Nice_n_Naughty

Jo pallavi ne kiya woh technically sharda ne karna chahiye tha😵


Definitely, but Sharda is not the type of person who would do that. Plus even if she did that she would still not get back the thirty-five years she wasted serving someone who isn't even grateful. Also she isn't a low person like Pallavi is. Why should Sharda fight for something that she can get anywhere? She is not like Pallavi who gives more importance to property than human emotions.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".