Shravan should ask for truth from Suman - Page 4

Originally posted by: mineforever

Me too.I hope they show it this week only.
He is totally naughty.
He is going to take full advantage of the promise..
My mind went straight to gutter

Originally posted by: faii44

I don't think so they'll show this scene this week cuz in todays snapchat stories nikita is wearing the same dress means the shooting is still going in fo that..

He is .. Loved the way he goes closer to her .

My mind is still in gutter thinking what will Shravan ask for😆

Originally posted by: mineforever

Yes even I think it will be shown next week only. This week the whole spying thing will be shown.
Oh Yes! the way he came closer to her
I don't think he will ask for a kiss though 😉

Originally posted by: indranigupta

I dont want Shravan to ask Sumo this question at least not now, and if I would have my way.. never.

If its only the past which can redeem their present.. or give its present form or shape of love.. if Shravan can only fall or keep on loving Sumo by clearing the past... it doesnt show a growth, a maturity in their understanding for each other.

If Shravan were to know of Sumo's reasons let it accidental... as if he has discovered in their journey together. I want them to know each other, understand each other, fall in love with each other as they are presently not otherwise.

But, it doesnt mean I do not value the past or those reasons are not important. For me, past is what has been so beautifully described by TS Eliot in the section Burnt Norton (The Four Quartets):

Time present and time past

Are both perhaps present in time future

And time future contained in time past

If all time is eternally present

All time is unredeemable.

What might have been is an abstraction

Remaining a perpetual possibility

Only in a world of speculation

what might have and what has been

Point to one end, which is always present.

For me, the past gives its meaning but it is realized or rather reaches its fruition

only in the present. If only the past was to declare that Sumo never left him.. there would be no story.. but if the present reveals those facets or nuances of character (Sumo's) to Shravan.. he would know it for sure... that she was always there, she was always meant to be.

Even Shravan's letter I wouldnt want it to be disclosed to Sumo.. somehow it diminishes Shravan's love for her which has grown expansive.. is full of pain and struggle yet it has never lost its brightness.

If they were to discover these hidden facets of their character.. let it be at the very end and also accidentally without any design on their part.

Originally posted by: chicksoup

👏

Wow, Indrani. Beautifully written. Especially the last part. 😳

Originally posted by: faii44

Yeah. I was thinking the same.

Haha he won't obviously but kia karein is dil ka aur soch ka😆😆

Originally posted by: indranigupta

I dont want Shravan to ask Sumo this question at least not now, and if I would have my way.. never.

If its only the past which can redeem their present.. or give its present form or shape of love.. if Shravan can only fall or keep on loving Sumo by clearing the past... it doesnt show a growth, a maturity in their understanding for each other.

If Shravan were to know of Sumo's reasons let it accidental... as if he has discovered in their journey together. I want them to know each other, understand each other, fall in love with each other as they are presently not otherwise.

But, it doesnt mean I do not value the past or those reasons are not important. For me, past is what has been so beautifully described by TS Eliot in the section Burnt Norton (The Four Quartets):

Time present and time past

Are both perhaps present in time future

And time future contained in time past

If all time is eternally present

All time is unredeemable.

What might have been is an abstraction

Remaining a perpetual possibility

Only in a world of speculation

what might have and what has been

Point to one end, which is always present.

For me, the past gives its meaning but it is realized or rather reaches its fruition

only in the present. If only the past was to declare that Sumo never left him.. there would be no story.. but if the present reveals those facets or nuances of character (Sumo's) to Shravan.. he would know it for sure... that she was always there, she was always meant to be.

Even Shravan's letter I wouldnt want it to be disclosed to Sumo.. somehow it diminishes Shravan's love for her which has grown expansive.. is full of pain and struggle yet it has never lost its brightness.

If they were to discover these hidden facets of their character.. let it be at the very end and also accidentally without any design on their part.

Originally posted by: _Eternity_

She was child at that time so may be mami didn't tell her about the loan but when she is mature she starts taunting her about her mother and debt which cut off her from her family ..my other point is that may be shra never know how she is at home as he says I never know your this side and sumo says you never asks at her childhood house..

Hope after this track we will get to see some flashbacks..