TB:Jai Kumar Nair to help Rajeev Surti - Page 8

Love u jai....Keep it upp the gr8 work
Cant wai8

Originally posted by: Simi_PagalLadki

🤣

hhahahhaha debu :D

lol..literally...

Originally posted by: ankit_nyc

😛 Hi DC, the farak is that we've actually seen D sir's students in the actual DID show.....couple of them were selected to be in the show....there was even that little girl who was brought in to perform in DID 2 who was D sir's student.....Haven't seen, or heard of anyone from Jai's "successful" dance institute in the public eye.........😛

Originally posted by: desicrowd

Arey bhaiyya...does getting in DID proves that their mentor is the best? D sir is a good choreographer and have seen him in DID LM but that doesn't mean Jai isn't just cos his students are not trying their hands on DID...maybe they are doing something better...sab reality shows ke deewane nahi hai....Remo too has dance institutes but his students didn't make it big in any show, does that mean he is any lesser than Terence just cos Terence's students are in DID? and just a reminder cos u r waiting how Jai will be when he wins anything...he was a winner of Boowgie woogie...and like after Dharmus loss it is said, its not about winning its about what you can do after...Jai and many others have benefited and made a lot of name after DID...so that more worth appreciating than rather pulling them down...Adter reading some comments of FB put by some friends out here....I don't think even Dharmesh wud like his fans putting anyone else down...😆...

Originally posted by: ankit_nyc

😊 Arey Behna, no one is pulling Jai down unfairly........Just pointing out facts about his habit of putting the winners down after the contest........he did it after DID 1 and he did it after DID lil masters........Each person is only in charge of their own actions........D sir, Jai, Shakti etc can not control how their fans act towards others but they sure can control themselves........Shakti, D sir, Kruti, Binny, Amar, etc behaved so well after the show and were so gracious towards each other......Jai however decided to put his fellow contestants down and that was completely under his control........He decided to pick on a little kid after DID lil masters which again was completely under his control...........So just saying that if given a choice of rooting for a nice human being who treats everyone with respect regardless of winning an losing or rooting for a mean person who puts down the winners of the contest repeatedly, I would choose to root for the nice human being......😛

Originally posted by: ankit_nyc

Being a good human being and gracious in defeat is not a desi quality but an universal human quality. People in any country don't respond well to people putting down the winners of a contest after the contest is done..........I live here in the states and have been watching talent shows, sports etc for years and I can honestly say that people here don't like people who make excuses for their defeats and put down winners of the contest by calling them undeserving etc......Jai can be confident all he wants but to put down the winners by calling them undeserving etc is just unsportsman like.........It wasn't even close in DID 1, he finished 4th for god's sake.......He didn't even finish in the top 3......and then what he did in DID lil masters is just the height of unsportsmanship.........He went after a little kid, Jeetu and also called him undeserving and said only his contestant deseved to win..........People the world over teach their kids to be humble in defeat and in victory........Being arrogant in defeat is looked down the world over NOT just in India........I don't recall the finalists in any of the American shows bashing the winner by calling them undeserving and if they did then they were hammered by the media for being sore losers as they should be because that kind of behavior should not be encouraged.........Are we to teach the kids to never accept defeat and never congratulate the winner? Are we to teach the kids to turn around and blame everyone like Jai does after defeat? Is that what we should be teaching the kids of today?

PS --- I thought D sir was better then Shakti in DID 2 but that doesn't mean I will call Shakti undeserving just because she won.........Salman, Siddhesh, and Alisha all finished ahead of Jai.....If he or his fans think it was unfair then fine all fans feel that it was unfair when their favorites don't win but that doesn't mean we go and bash the winners and the audience.......If the audience was wrong, Zee rigged the votes etc, then go out in the real world and prove everyone wrong by being successful........😊

Perceptions on Jai seemed to be formed based on FB. As far as I know his public behavior has never been abrasive. I refuse to accept any personal assessment based on FB statuses.
- Their authenticity is unreliable
- Even if authentic they are not fully managed by the person
- There is greying of the lines between professional and personal interaction
- It does not reflect inflection and emotion

Celebrity social networking are meant to follow a celebrity as in fact updates, appearances, whats going on, not for interpersonal assessments. Forget celebrities, I'd be upset if people gauged me as a person based on FB updates and sporadic interactions.

But that is fine, social networking is a double edged sword and when someone chooses to be out there, they are fair game for such assessment.

Either way, no matter what this assessment is based on - both honesty and humility are equally important factors in being a good human. Some people choose to be humble, some people choose to be honest.

There is nothing wrong in being honest, there is nothing wrong in expressing undiluted opinions as long as it is respectful, sincere, and downright honest. To give an example Maks in DWTS is extremely outspoken - he does not hold back from arguing with judges, nor does he mince his words if he feels a contestant is undeserving. He accepted his elimination sportingly but very brazenly expressed that Bristol Palin did not deserve to get as far as she did. Some people hate Maks for him being so outspoken. However, a lot of people including the judges and fellow choregraphers do respect him because he is a great choreographer, knows his stuff and is brutally honest.

However, if you genuinely want the epitome of cocky, disrespectful and rude then look at Marcel in Top Chef. Marcel accepted his elimination gracefully and never called anyone undeserving etc. But it was clearly evident in how he treated people that he was full of himself and actually considered himself superior even if he did not say it in words.

Sometimes criticism and disagreeing is a form of honesty and respect, being dishonest and disrespectful can be done through saying nothing but undermining in other ways. I personally find saccharine coated humility to be over the top and disrespectful to honest assessment of talent.

Finally, I understand that perhaps to some people Jai Kumar Nair does actually appear to be a rude, disrespectful, full of himself, cocky person who is a terrible human being and a sore loser. None of that, absolutely none of that undermines talent and accomplishments. Credit has to be given when it is due, and Jai Kumar Nair has worked hard to be where he is, he is immensely talented, he has accomplished things very few people can and more opportunities are going his way. Why should his accomplishments be undermined simply because he has other flaws or is disagreeable to some. Bottom line is merit and accomplishment.

Unless of course being a good human being, sportsmanship and other such virtues are supposed to be practiced on a pick and choose basis. Its purely arbitrary who should be commended and appreciated and who should not. You pick and choose who you like and praise their success, and undermine all others. After all being a good human being and sportsmanship teach us the tit for tat system. Sportsmanship means if you find someone to be a prick, thats good enough reason to be a prick back at them and undermine everything they do. After all good humans make sure we point out the bad humans and put them down all the time.

^^RTH I do like Marcel...😊...yes he is kinda cocky and irritating but he is good at his work and many competing with him know that and hence hate him more...

Originally posted by: desicrowd

^^RTH I do like Marcel...😊...yes he is kinda cocky and irritating but he is good at his work and many competing with him know that and hence hate him more...

No doubt Marcel is an incredible chef. I thought he would win season too. However, I think he wins the least liked contestants in Top Chef history hands down. He did not chillax like Dale learned too.

All DID contestants and judges are darling peaches in front of some TC contestants. 😆 (Thats my DID related on topic content 😛)

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

Finally, I understand that perhaps to some people Jai Kumar Nair does actually appear to be a rude, disrespectful, full of himself, cocky person who is a terrible human being and a sore loser. None of that, absolutely none of that undermines talent and accomplishments. Credit has to be given when it is due, and Jai Kumar Nair has worked hard to be where he is, he is immensely talented, he has accomplished things very few people can and more opportunities are going his way. Why should his accomplishments be undermined simply because he has other flaws or is disagreeable to some. Bottom line is merit and accomplishment.

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

Perceptions on Jai seemed to be formed based on FB. As far as I know his public behavior has never been abrasive. I refuse to accept any personal assessment based on FB statuses.
- Their authenticity is unreliable
- Even if authentic they are not fully managed by the person
- There is greying of the lines between professional and personal interaction
- It does not reflect inflection and emotion

Celebrity social networking are meant to follow a celebrity as in fact updates, appearances, whats going on, not for interpersonal assessments. Forget celebrities, I'd be upset if people gauged me as a person based on FB updates and sporadic interactions.

But that is fine, social networking is a double edged sword and when someone chooses to be out there, they are fair game for such assessment.

Either way, no matter what this assessment is based on - both honesty and humility are equally important factors in being a good human. Some people choose to be humble, some people choose to be honest.

There is nothing wrong in being honest, there is nothing wrong in expressing undiluted opinions as long as it is respectful, sincere, and downright honest. To give an example Maks in DWTS is extremely outspoken - he does not hold back from arguing with judges, nor does he mince his words if he feels a contestant is undeserving. He accepted his elimination sportingly but very brazenly expressed that Bristol Palin did not deserve to get as far as she did. Some people hate Maks for him being so outspoken. However, a lot of people including the judges and fellow choregraphers do respect him because he is a great choreographer, knows his stuff and is brutally honest.

However, if you genuinely want the epitome of cocky, disrespectful and rude then look at Marcel in Top Chef. Marcel accepted his elimination gracefully and never called anyone undeserving etc. But it was clearly evident in how he treated people that he was full of himself and actually considered himself superior even if he did not say it in words.

Sometimes criticism and disagreeing is a form of honesty and respect, being dishonest and disrespectful can be done through saying nothing but undermining in other ways. I personally find saccharine coated humility to be over the top and disrespectful to honest assessment of talent.

Finally, I understand that perhaps to some people Jai Kumar Nair does actually appear to be a rude, disrespectful, full of himself, cocky person who is a terrible human being and a sore loser. None of that, absolutely none of that undermines talent and accomplishments. Credit has to be given when it is due, and Jai Kumar Nair has worked hard to be where he is, he is immensely talented, he has accomplished things very few people can and more opportunities are going his way. Why should his accomplishments be undermined simply because he has other flaws or is disagreeable to some. Bottom line is merit and accomplishment.

Unless of course being a good human being, sportsmanship and other such virtues are supposed to be practiced on a pick and choose basis. Its purely arbitrary who should be commended and appreciated and who should not. You pick and choose who you like and praise their success, and undermine all others. After all being a good human being and sportsmanship teach us the tit for tat system. Sportsmanship means if you find someone to be a prick, thats good enough reason to be a prick back at them and undermine everything they do. After all good humans make sure we point out the bad humans and put them down all the time.