did parvati meet daksh? - Page 3

I actually like that they are having Parvati meet Daksha and Prasuti. In fact a few weeks back I said the same thing in a thread here, that maybe they could have them meet. Daksha would finally get his daughter's forgiveness and his story would come to a neat end. Of course the creatives ruined the potential impact of that meeting by pushing Parvati and Sati's eras so close together. It would have made a lot more impact if they had retained the big gap so that Daksha would have done penance for a long time before finally getting to meet his daughter again. The audience would have felt that he earned his redemption.

Yes it's a bit filmy but they've taken a lot of liberties for entertainment purposes already. What's one more or less? And some creative license is fine if it serves the story IMO. In fact, they could have been much more creative with Daksha-Parvati's meeting.

As for whether Daksha and Prasuti would have lived that long; well, people of earlier eras are believed to have lived much longer than modern day humans. So it wouldn't have been that unbelievable in that context.

Originally posted by: Kal El

I actually like that they are having Parvati meet Daksha and Prasuti. In fact a few weeks back I said the same thing in a thread here, that maybe they could have them meet. Daksha would finally get his daughter's forgiveness and his story would come to a neat end. Of course the creatives ruined the potential impact of that meeting by pushing Parvati and Sati's eras so close together. It would have made a lot more impact if they had retained the big gap so that Daksha would have done penance for a long time before finally getting to meet his daughter again. The audience would have felt that he earned his redemption.

Yes it's a bit filmy but they've taken a lot of liberties for entertainment purposes already. What's one more or less? And some creative license is fine if it serves the story IMO. In fact, they could have been much more creative with Daksha-Parvati's meeting.

As for whether Daksha and Prasuti would have lived that long; well, people of earlier eras are believed to have lived much longer than modern day humans. So it wouldn't have been that unbelievable in that context.

What Kind of redemption will Daksh get, and why should he get redemption? just for the sake of neat ending of story. I really don't get that point, after blabbering so much venom about Lord Shiva
does redemption really make sense?

For God's sake this story about God himself, any changes in story line should serve purpose of enhancing devotion and creating more aastha among devotees. Changes which don't contribute in any way with respect to story narration are absurd and ridiculous.

argument that people like it that way has also no backing, please compare TRPS of satvish episode, jata's episode with episode's which conformed with the scriptures. obviously people cannot and will not like messing up of their God's story in the name creative license.

Its utterly ridiculous how a couple ( Mena and himavan) who are devotees of balaji get aadishakti as daughter so easily. according to CV's only Vishnu bhakts are eligible to give birth to aadi shakti . i was really incensed by yesterday's episode in which Himavan said he will marry off his daughter to some prince and this woman horrific woman starts celebrating and in front of dadhichi Himavan starts blabbering about he being kshatriya.

CVs should remember that this is not some ordinary story and they cannot in the name of creative license can show whatever they want.

Regards
krishna

Originally posted by: kkr531

What Kind of redemption will Daksh get, and why should he get redemption? just for the sake of neat ending of story. I really don't get that point, after blabbering so much venom about Lord Shiva
does redemption really make sense?

For God's sake this story about God himself, any changes in story line should serve purpose of enhancing devotion and creating more aastha among devotees. Changes which don't contribute in any way with respect to story narration are absurd and ridiculous.

argument that people like it that way has also no backing, please compare TRPS of satvish episode, jata's episode with episode's which conformed with the scriptures. obviously people cannot and will not like messing up of their God's story in the name creative license.

Its utterly ridiculous how a couple ( Mena and himavan) who are devotees of balaji get aadishakti as daughter so easily. according to CV's only Vishnu bhakts are eligible to give birth to aadi shakti . i was really incensed by yesterday's episode in which Himavan said he will marry off his daughter to some prince and this woman horrific woman starts celebrating and in front of dadhichi Himavan starts blabbering about he being kshatriya.

CVs should remember that this is not some ordinary story and they cannot in the name of creative license can show whatever they want.

Regards
krishna

well said.. creative team should let Shivji/Parvati storyline be authentic.. i cant understand why they mess up wiht the history off our S/P why do they need to spice their story up..or they just want to earn lots of money and messin things up..shame on them!! is nothin holy anymore??!!