Did the Holocaust really take place? - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

21

Views

3.7k

Users

9

Likes

40

Frequent Posters

return_to_hades thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 11 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: -Roshan-

This was one of my first research tools that really put me to thoughts. This documentary was filmed and produced by a Jewish man himself.

No, I am not a Holocaust denier - I never was! But then, when you are presented with alternative facts, your mind and soul will oscillate between accepting the facts and reviewing the other side of the coin.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWCOjOj4RAU



http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/may/03/david-stein-cole-holocaust-revisionist

You could do better than believing in a video produced by a guy whose credibility was shredded, recanted his statements and actually completely changed his identity to alienate himself from such productions.

PS: He isn't a real Jew.
SomeOldUser thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Engager Level 4 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 11 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: return_to_hades



http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/may/03/david-stein-cole-holocaust-revisionist

You could do better than believing in a video produced by a guy whose credibility was shredded, recanted his statements and actually completely changed his identity to alienate himself from such productions.

PS: He isn't a real Jew.



He isn't a real Jew? Why? On what basis have you concluded that?
CuckooCutter7 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#13
no it did not take place...😛 that is if one believes nut jobs, neo-nazis, anti-semite conspiracy theorists in the ME, and are otherwise so oblivious to things that one wouldn't know their right fat ass from their left. 😆

on the other side, there are countless witnesses, documentaries and photographs. Even the Germans have reconciled to the ugly nazi past! And it wasn't just ugly because they happened to lose the war!

so yeah, even if one doesn't buy into everything they have in history books, it doesn''t mean one can spout absurd, cuckoo stories or just manufacture the history versions one prefers.😆
Edited by BirdieNumNum - 11 years ago
441597 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#14
^^Anybody remember Ahmadinejad? Just askin.
K.Universe. thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#15
If you go by the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, every event exists as a wave function which contains every possible outcome of that event. When observed, the wave function collapses into the actual outcome.

Going by the Many Worlds Interpretation, every possible outcome of any event is realized in a separate universe which exists alongside our own.

Which means, in one universe Nazis massacred Jews, in another universe Jews massacred Nazis, in a different universe Jews and Nazis were friends and in yet another universe there were no Jews or Nazis. And so on.

Going back to the observation aspect of this post, historians observed that Nazis massacred Jews in this universe.

So, yes, holocaust happened in this universe.

K.Universe. thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#16


Hokum huh? That's a big word. How long have you been waiting to use that in a sentence?

Now that we got the barbs out of the way, I can see how some of what I say might come across as hokum to certain people whose debating styles are hackneyed and have not evolved with time. I don't mean any disrespect; it's just constructive criticism.

The question was pretty simple. Did holocaust take place? To my mind, the answer is simpler. Check with historians.

Now, who are these historians, what makes them the authority on something that has happened in the past, what is historiography, how do historians analyze facts, how do historians come up with a narrative of what happened, all of this is not debate material; it is information freely available for anyone ready enough to absorb it.

Are historians objective? Did they exhibit bias? We could debate that but how do you think we would end up establishing the veracity of those stories, those videos, those journals, those articles, those tales of yore? Who or which source do we trust? Wouldn't that mean the debate will stretch forever with incessant name calling ("you are anti-Semite!", "you are not very erudite!", "you are a Neo-Nazi!", "You are cuckoo!") in between?

This is why I augmented my original one line argument ("historians corroborated holocaust") with alternatives. A scenario where all possibilities play out in the vast cosmos. Backed by science whose premise is impregnable.

441597 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#17

Originally posted by: K.Universe.



Hokum huh? That's a big word. How long have you been waiting to use that in a sentence?

Now that we got the barbs out of the way, I can see how some of what I say might come across as hokum to certain people whose debating styles are hackneyed and have not evolved with time. I don't mean any disrespect; it's just constructive criticism.

The question was pretty simple. Did holocaust take place? To my mind, the answer is simpler. Check with historians.

Now, who are these historians, what makes them the authority on something that has happened in the past, what is historiography, how do historians analyze facts, how do historians come up with a narrative of what happened, all of this is not debate material; it is information freely available for anyone ready enough to absorb it.

Are historians objective? Did they exhibit bias? We could debate that but how do you think we would end up establishing the veracity of those stories, those videos, those journals, those articles, those tales of yore? Who or which source do we trust? Wouldn't that mean the debate will stretch forever with incessant name calling ("you are anti-Semite!", "you are not very erudite!", "you are a Neo-Nazi!", "You are cuckoo!") in between?

This is why I augmented my original one line argument ("historians corroborated holocaust") with alternatives. A scenario where all possibilities play out in the vast cosmos. Backed by science whose premise is impregnable.



I meant "hokum" in a positive way, K. As in, the Quantam Mechanics example you exhibited. Nothing like counter-hokum to counter neo-Nazi hokum, is what I meant.
K.Universe. thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#18

Originally posted by: krystal_watz


I meant "hokum" in a positive way, K. As in, the Quantam Mechanics example you exhibited. Nothing like counter-hokum to counter neo-Nazi hokum, is what I meant.



Oh! There goes the (manufactured) passion out the window then.



maha2us thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#19
Rth, I am telling based on your reply to my post.
The first point is there were German colonies. You can see that in the wiki page by googling 'German colonies'.

As another point I neither justify British colonization nor do I justify whatever Hitler did. I was only asking how someone felt based on the question Hitler asked?

The question which can definitely asked is did the holocaust happen to such magnitude as reported by historians from the Allies country. There could definitely be some exaggerations. And there are also reports a good number of Jews who disappeared in Germany reappeared in Israel later.

Still certain points remain which are the ones i like to highlight. Human exploitation went to the heights in Modern age and this definitely causes some problems and disturbances. And the exploitation went to one country exploiting another country. We all know till 1914, whatever happened between colonial powers were governed by treaties. But in 1914, all the treaties went off probably because Germany also were making claims for colonies. And by Versailes treaty, the German colonies were taken away by Birtain and France. Even though the wars could have complicated reasons, if two things were not to happen no war could have occured. if there were no large scale human exploitation and there is no disagreement between colonial powers, would there have been war?

I am not sure whether Britain were benign as colonial powers. But I could say Indians let British rule them smoothly and let them do whatever they liked. British did occupy Afghanistan. But Afgahnistan remained colony for only two yrs. Why? Is it because Afghans had weapons which matched the British?
441597 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#20
^The war would never have occurred had Germany not carried out foreign incursions. The Holocaust wouldn't have meant shite to the Western powers if the Balance of Power wasn't disrupted.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".