Opinion of the week#2: Classes shuld start @11am?

6508 thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#1

Hey Guys,
Introducing
OPINION OF THE WEEK.

Every week we will try to have a new thing as Opinion of the week.
It can be the lastest film, book, show, news or just anything!

So this week, it's.....


Should Teenager's classes start at 11am?

A pioneering headteacher is calling for all secondary schools to follow his lead and start classes at 11am, allowing teenagers two hours extra in bed.

Dr Paul Kelley, head of Monkseaton Community High School in North Tyneside, said it would mean the end of "teenage zombies" dozing off in lessons before lunch, after experiments showed teenagers could have different body clocks from adults and younger children.

Russell Foster, an Oxford professor of neuroscience, tested the memory of 200 Monkseaton pupils at 9am and 2pm using pairs of words, and discovered a 9% improvement in the afternoon. Students correctly identified 51% of word pairs in the later session, compared with 42% in the morning. Tayler McCullough, 15, one of the test subjects, said the majority of students would welcome the extra hours in bed. "I'm extremely hard to get up in the morning. One or two people like to get to school early, but most of us would be up for going in later. I'm sure it would make a big difference to our learning ability."

Kelley is adamant a change of school timetable will have a significant impact on exam performance. He said: "Teenagers aren't lazy. We're depriving them of the sleep they need through purely biological factors beyond their control. This has a negative impact on their learning, and possibly on their mental and physical health. We've just learnt of this, but it is vital that we act on it.

"The research carried out by Professor Foster showed that, from the age of 10, our internal body clocks shift, so it's good for young people to stay in bed. They peak at 20 then gradually go back again, but body clocks do not reach the pre-teenage level until around 55 years old. The 'time shift' is two hours on average, so teenagers should get up two hours later. We are making teenagers ratty by making them get up early."

He wants his school's governors to approve his plan and put the new timetable in place before the opening of Monkseaton's new 20m school building, the most technologically advanced in the country, in September.

Kelley has a history of groundbreaking teaching methods. In January, he carried out a trial at Monkseaton High that found pupils scored up to 90% in a GCSE science paper after one session involving three 20-minute bursts interspersed with 10-minute breaks for physical activity. The 48 year-nine pupils had not covered any part of the GCSE science syllabus before the lessons. In 1998, Kelley established a scheme with the Open University bridging the divide between school and university by allowing sixth formers to study undergraduate modules alongside their A-levels.

Kelley hopes his latest idea will be just as successful. "We have to be pragmatic. But this proves that, by starting later, children's learning improves, as does their health."

Foster said: "This is preliminary data, but what's exciting is that it matches more detailed studies carried out in Canada and the US. Teenagers get up late not because they are lazy but because they are biologically programmed to do so."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2009/mar/08/teenagers-sleep-education-secondary-school

SO What do you think Teenagers and Adults both?


So lets hear your opinion!!!!
Do you think this is rght based on the evidence😳
Or is it being plain lazy and not biologically related?



Regards

GD DT.

Created

Last reply

Replies

14

Views

1.6k

Users

15

Frequent Posters

hazel94 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 16 years ago
#2
I agree i love to sleep
but im not sure
coz in the afternoon i dont lyk to study
if schools open at normal time then we can get in the habit of getitng up early coz we wil have to do it wen we get jobs
im confused now!!
-Mystery- thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 16 years ago
#3
Well, there is good evidence on both sides so we can't just rely on that.

Generally I am an evening person and I hate to wake up early, but once I am up, then it doesn't matter anymore.

So it's a not a big deal for me, but even if we do this for the schools what will happen when we get jobs?

Then a whole lot of us will have to get up and be ready by 9 or so. So personally I don't mind it at all. And it's hard to change this after so so many years of regular early morning timings.

-Mahi


Yazzi thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 16 years ago
#4
i agree with the idea ...

i remember when i was at school i had to wake up at 6.00 in the morning just to have breakfast .... because if i woke up at 7.00 i would be late for school and end up missing breakfast ...

and we all know breakfast is the most important meal of the day, secondly ... teenagers are still more or less asleep early in the morning, so their brain doesn't register half of the things that are being taught ...

by the evening the sleep finally vanishes ..

so yeah i agree with the decision ... and it should be the same for college or Uni going student lolz ... i don't want the kids to have all the advantages ..

246851 thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#5
have to teaCH D GERMANS DAT! classes alays start at 8 her, and exams nearly always at 9
Yosh thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#6
Classes starting 2 hours later would mean they would finish 2 hours later. So I guess students would just sleep later than normal to allow time for everything they do. So not sure it would make so much difference.

Personally I love 10am starts! It means I have to wake up at 8.15/8.30ish. I think it's awesome because I get a decent amount of sleep, I miss the morning rush hour and my brain is ready to work by the time lecture starts.

Princess.. thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#7
ok this is dicey...
i mean on one hand as we see, some ppl like me looooooooovvvveee to sleep..
so it would be good for us ...
lol

on the other hand, if classes start 2 hrs later then it means that they will end 2 hrs later as Yosh said..

so i really cant choose say...

..oneOone.. thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 16 years ago
#8
ya..............tey should start a bit late
when i use to have schools, i have to leave at 5 in the morning to get there at 7:30............long distance......

but now, my classes start at 11:45 and its pretty good........

But the biggest advantage i see is that u get a pretty good time to study rest of the day if u get school early....

You get really lazy if classes start at 11

but still, the thinking of having 2 more hour sleep with others was just to fascinating then to be reject

what we can say..................i am a lazy girl

hheheheh

lolz
ana

-Pinky- thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#9
yah absolutely classes should start at 11... we would at least get more sleep!!! its hard to concentrate in the morning. .well its hard to concentrate at any time 😆 but atleast ppl wouldnt sleep in classes if they started at 11


mits002 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#10
Well I agree that today's teenagers like me like to stay up late at night..chatting with friends or completing assignment last minute.
So I would really go for 11 am..
I had the same thing in my high school
9th and 12th kids started school at 7:30 and 10th and 11th started at 10:30
So it worked out fine for me!
NICE TOPIC!

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".