CID Re-Run (Discussions & Videos) - I - Page 35

yes there was no connection between face off and london trial.i have sawn both of them nice case

I think my post was missed, so I'll post it again:I was out of touch for CID for 2 months from June-Aug 2002. Does anybody know what cases were shown during that time period?

The names I can recollect are, I am missing a couple of names.

THE CASE OF THE COMATOSE VICTIM
THE BLOODY TRAIL
RETURN OF DAKSH
ABHIJEET IN DANGER

Edit:
===============
The cases were aired between Jun-Aug 2004 not 2002. I mis-read the year

Are you replying to my post, Prabha Di? In that case, Asha would have worked with Daksh. But I'm sure that did not happen.

Of course to you, who else could it be. Its your post above mine. Sorry to say this but this response is from what I have been seeing for sometime. You always seem to be in denial of the information I provide. I almost feel like a fool. If that's the case I am happy keeping information to myself.

Edit
================
Apologies for over reacting.

Originally posted by: prabhanarayan

Of course to you, who else could it be. Its your post above mine. Sorry to say this but this response is from what I have been seeing for sometime. You always seem to be in denial of the information I provide. I almost feel like a fool. If that's the case I am happy keeping information to myself.

No, no. You've misinterpreted me. It's just that I was voicing my opinion that if Daksh came in at 2002 and Asha went in 2004, then they must have worked together. But I have never seen them together. I'm not saying you're wrong, I may be wrong too, can't I?😊

Oh I should have read more carefully, I have gave details about Jun-Aug 2004 not 2002. I am sorry I over reacting.

The problem is I don't have any names of cases from 2002 but I can give you case preview of episodes aired between Jun-Aug 2002. 2 Previews from June 2002 and 4 from Aug 2002.

JUNE 2002
===============================

Dr. Salunkhe is driving on the road when he almost bangs into a pedestrian who suddenly darts across. An accident is averted in time but strong words are exchanged and both men lose their temper. An insignificant event at the time takes on a lot of significance, when the same man is found dead. Dr. Salunkhe is the prime accused of the murder.

With very little time for the next hearing, the CID officers try and find out who would gain from framing Dr. Salunkhe in a murder. With just a fragment of glass found at the crime scene, they manage to get to the most likely suspect. But how did he frame Dr Salunkhe? How did he manage to get Dr Salunkhe's fingerprints on the crime scene and murder weapon? As the court date looms, the CID team races against time.

AUGUST 2002
===============================
An apparent street accident turns out to be a brutal murder. The dead man has no identification on him and all the CID find is a clipping of a matrimonial advertisement hidden on his person. The only problem is there is no such girl as the matrimonial describes... the entire ad is fake. so what does it really mean? An innocuous matrimonial ad leads the CID into a bizarre case of wheeler, dealers and cold blooded murderers...

An investigation into a collection of clippings of matrimonial advertisements makes the cops realise that the innocuous ads are actually coded essages indicating meeting places. But what happens in these meetings? Unsure, the CID decides to place a coded message of his own and the cops go undercover to see what happens. The ACP doesn't realise it, but he has literally signed his own death warrant.


Dr Salunkhe is in a hysterical state and even as the CID rushes to stop him, he manages to shoot himself. As he is rushed into surgery, the CID team contemplates one of the toughest cases they have ever come up against? A seemingly innocuous case on the outside of a burglary and murder but a complex case that has turned cop against cop and them against each other bringing in a new forensic investigator, cause Dr Salunkhe to turn his gun, on himself?

The victim was clearly murdered by a gunshot and the gun has been found, but the bullet has conveniently gone missing. The ACP is aware that without the bullet any ballistics test is not possible and they cannot incriminate the killer who is from the victim's family. Is it a coincidence that forensic expert Dr Salunkhe is a friend of the family's? Salunkhe meanwhile has put a counter accusation on CID officer Abhijit of having tampered with the evidence on the crime scene. Where did the bullet go? A new forensic investigator comes in to investigate Salunkhe himself!

i think prabha di has taken 2002 for 2004....dats why the confusion....the cases which she has mentioned were of 2004....debayon has asked episodes of 2002...a simple confusion...

relax both of u...

can anyone tell me when did vivek appear in his first case??? n what was the name of the episode???
was it in 2007???