Chandra-Nandini = Chandini

First Previous

Page

118

Next Last

Frequent Posters

k.taddy1234

@k.taddy1234

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#1051

Originally posted by: krithikaRao

She as come a long way . What she deserves to be appreciated 😛👏

Chal good night 😛

Good night 😊

Quote

Sabdabhala

@Sabdabhala

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#1052

GIRLS, I HOPE YOU REALIZE QUITE CLEARLY THAT MAGADH NARESH HAS A VICHITRA AABHAAS WHENEVER ANYONE ELSE IS TOO CLOSE TO HIM 😉

HOW DO YOU PLAN TO OVERCOME THIS OBSTACLE 😆

SAARE KE SAARE SAPNE DEKHNE MEIN MAGAN HAIN, KOI VAASTAVIKTA KA GYAAN NAHI HAI 😃

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

jayaks02

@jayaks02

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#1053

I felt Rajat maintained decency and decorum while he did those somewhat sensitive scenes in Prime Time TV Slot with Helena. he was dignified from acting perspective but his character was let down by CVs.

He has used Helena in some sense. He is going back on his words . Also she does have conjugal rights and who bothers about presence of Hriday while one has to fulfill duties ?

If Helena does something bad this week to damage N's child bearing capacity, it is not a bad thing from her view. She has been let down very badly by Chandra.

Quote

shreya roy

@munni_rajatfan

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#1054

& i thought the thread's name is chandini. oops i forgot using rajat is always necessary. use & throw just like chandra is doing with his other wives.😆

Quote

shreya roy

@munni_rajatfan

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#1055

& i was told tht i dont like nandini.😆

Quote

Sabdabhala

@Sabdabhala

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#1056

VIDYA, ALL THIS LOGIC AND SENSE IS USELESS IN EKTA LAND

I HAVE NOT READ MUCH ABOUT CGM, BUT I ALWAYS THOUGHT HE HAD TWO WIVES - DURDHARA, WHO WAS BINDUSARAS MOM, WHO DIED AT CHILDBIRTH, AND THEN HELENA

I HAVE MY DOUBT IF HE WAS POLYGAMOUS, BECAUSE THE SECOND WIFE CAME ONLY AFTER FIRST ONE DIED

THAT WAS WHAT I HAD READ. OF COURSE, I COULD BE WRONG

ALSO MY VIEW ABOUT POLYGAMOUS EMPERORS, CGM OR OTHERS, IS THAT THEY MIGHT BE DRAWN TO WOMEN BECAUSE OF MULTIPLE CAUSES, GETTING HEIRS BEING THE MOST IMPORTANT, BUT LOVE ETC DOES NOT HOLD SO MUCH IMPORTANCE FOR THEM, AS THEY ARE FORVER IN WARS AND OTHER STRATEGIC WORK IN ORDER TO BUILD SUCH A HUGE EMPIRE.

FURTHER, SHOWING A POLYGAMOUS EMPEROR BEHAVE IN THIS MANNER IS VERY WIERD, IMO

HE MARRIED DURDHARA FOR MONEY, AND HELENA FOR HER ARMY ETC, AND NANDINI TO PRIMARILY TAKE REVENGE. ACCEPTED

HE MADE DURDHARA PREGNANT AT ACHARYAS BEHEST, USED HELENA OFF AND ON TO ANNOY AND MAKE NANDU JEALOUS, AND THEN HE GRADUALLY FELL IN LOVE WITH NANDU, IS ALSO ACCEPTED

BUT FOR HIM TO GET SO UNCOMFORTABLE WHILE BEING PHYSICAL IS ABSURD REALLY 😆

THE WAY HE WAS SQUIRMING IN DISCOMFORT WAS REALLY FUNNY 😲

YES RAJAT DID IT WELL

Quote

amina1

@amina1

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#1057

Originally posted by: jayaks02
I felt Rajat maintained decency and decorum while he did those somewhat sensitive scenes in Prime Time TV Slot with Helena. he was dignified from acting perspective but his character was let down by CVs.

He has used Helena in some sense. He is going back on his words . Also she does have conjugal rights and who bothers about presence of Hriday while one has to fulfill duties ?

If Helena does something bad this week to damage N's child bearing capacity, it is not a bad thing from her view. She has been let down very badly by Chandra.

not only chandra but intire maurya clan they are to me plain racist especially dur she's being left out made to feel outsider

Quote

amina1

@amina1

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#1058

If in reality what will a woman do if in helena position,i have seen marriage s broken beacause of accusations and distrust how pathetic a husband can't fulfill her wish

Quote

Sabdabhala

@Sabdabhala

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#1059

ALL EKTA VAMPS DO REALLY BAD STUFF, AND SO SHALL HELENA, I GUESS 😆

LIKE THE FEMALE LEAD CAN DO NO WRONG, VAMPS CAN DO NO RIGHT 😆

THERE IS A CLEAR BLACK AND WHITE DISTINCTION HERE, WHICH IS THE MOST UNREAL THING

IF YOU REALLY THINK ABOUT IT, HELENA HAS A RIGHT TO BE DEVASTATED AND FEEL SUPER ANGRY WITH CHANDRA.

AGREED THAT HE NEVER PROFESSED HIS LOVE TO HER, BUT THERE WERE QUITE A FEW SCENES WHEN HE LED HER ON

THE ONLY PROBLEM WITH HELENA IS THAT SHE DIRECTS HER ANGER AT NANDINI AND NOT AT CHANDRA

IT MAY BE BECAUSE OF NANDU THAT CHANDU REJECTED HER, BUT TECHNICALLY SPEAKING NANDINI WAS NOT AT FAULT. HELENA SHOULD THINK ABOUT PUNISHING CHANDRA, AND CERTAINLY NOT NANDINI

IT WAS CHANDRA WHO REJECTED HER

Quote

shreya roy

@munni_rajatfan

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#1060

well just one thing amidst all. chandra married helena bcoz CK told, infact helena could have refused but she didnt. as per duru goes he had refused it was duru who actually convinced him & in nandini's case also he had refused 1st bcoz he was clear tht he dont want to marry her forcefully it was nandini who accepted the alliance. so as per his marriages goes it was the ladies who took the decisions & if they had refused maybe marriages wouldnt have happened. apart from tht denying helu in the name of prem is stupid bcoz at the end of the day helena has rights & whether anyone likes her or not its the fact. it looks good in the la la land but practically such decisions can cost not only the person but also the king.

Quote

1 ... 104 105 106 107 108 ... 118

Chandra-Nandini = Chandini - Page 106

Related Topics

Explore Topics