Is Ranbir Kapoor better ACTOR than Hrithik? - Page 5

well nothing new that Ranveer fans will choose Hrithik as better actor.

I think both are good.

Originally posted by: _symphony

What is a good actor? Someone who always does best in same kind of roles or someone who experiments and is phenomenal in some while mediocre in some. Ranbir excels in first and Hrithik in second. I am yet to see Ranbir in any different kind of role that his contemporaries have done. Like a period film character like what a Shahid, Hrithik or Ranveer have done. Or a RAW agent/soldier/policeman. Ranbir too like Ayushmann sticks to one type of films while Hrithik is more similar to the likes of Ranveer who want to do different things.

Don't forget to include genre-categories when talking about movies.

Both are awesome

HR was very good in Fighter

Versatile actor

Can we simply start with how well did their last three movies do?

Why are half of you talking about looks and dancing and charisma. That's not the question

They would have to play the same role and then, maybe, one could know if

"Is Ranbir Kapoor better ACTOR than Hrithik?"

They both have already proved that they can act.

Hrithik's last three movies could add up to 800 cr if we assume that fighter could reach up to 350 cr. RK's Animal alone was over 900 cr. We haven't yet added his last two movies. With these numbers who would the production-houses consider as better?

They wouldn't look at "better" but at 'more profitable'...

Originally posted by: Clochette

They wouldn't look at "better" but at 'more profitable'...

Profitability is a marker in most movies. Shouldn't an advantage and merit be awarded to that Actor as better?