Originally posted by: simim
There was. But it was swept away with the usual... feminists are the spawn of devil argument. Vijay and his fans mocked and bullied people who spoke against it. But I do think that the reaction was not this much. Plus it’s a Telugu movie. It will not have the reach of a Hindi movie.
See this movie resonates with most men in India. That’s why it’s such a big hit. Otherwise has any of Shahids movies had such an impact?
Everyone wants to be able to go lord over someone and have that woman allow it. And not have to have the inconvenience of stalking her into submission. That guy in that obnoxious video about reviews against KS said that this was reality and not like a movie and that’s why people liked it and that’s true.
Telugu movies and the industry have always had terrible and problematic movies and that’s why perhaps the reaction was not that extreme. Even now the kind of language being used by Telugu guys to criticise women who have spoken against the directors interview is appalling. And of course the word feminist is being used once again as the worst kind of human.
The mind set of regular normal Indian men ( as opposed to more travelled, educated and having the opportunity to interact with a more diverse population) is to show a clip from a forthcoming movie in Telugu- in which Rakul is shown as being more forward than the hero and saying stuff like till now I showed u only the U certificate side of me. Now I will show u the A certificate part of me- as equally terrible to whatever Vanga told. Saying why aren’t feminists commenting on something so terrible?
So for such people... and you have to admit that the stupendous success of the movie indicates a large chunk of Indians do think like that and not just South Indians as you are trying to portray.....it’s the right kind of movie
Very few people are seeing it for the acting or the movie making quality.... for many people it’s a ‘realistic’ movie which depicts what actually happens and so they are able to relate to it and appreciate it.
64