Why did Rajeev Masand give 3.5 stars to ADHM?

Page

Next Last

Sherlock.

@Sherlock.

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

Whoever watched it knows how terrible the movie is.
Rajeev Masand is trustworthy and usually rates movies well and he gave 3.5 stars for which I went to watch ADHM but it deserved only 1 star?

Is the recent too many interviews with Ranbir Kapoor the reason for giving 3.5 stars??

So will he also give 3.5 stars to Vin-Deepika XXX movie??

Quote

Frequent Posters

LapinLaCocotte

@MostlyHarmIess

Stunner

+ 5

Posted: 8 years ago

To be fair, I don't think there has been any Bollywood film that deserved more than 2.5/5 this year... 3 to be generous 😆

That said 25 lakhs 😆

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

ponymo

@ponymo

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

As per me it's a 3 star movie. But he also gave 3 stars to PRDP, in that case ADHM deserves 4.5 stars given how better it was as a film. 😆

Quote

Sherlock.

@Sherlock.

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: ponymo
As per me it's a 3 star movie. But he also gave 3 stars to PRDP, in that case ADHM deserves 4.5 stars given how better it was as a film. 😆

W*F did he give 3 stars to PRDP 😲 😲 I lost faith in him then.

Quote

Phosphorus

@Novarieaa

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

Masand is trusted? LOL

He works as PR more often than not.

I would rather believe a Anupama. She is pretty much unbiased despite having her favorites. 😆

Edit: Just checked he gave 3.5 to Sultan too. There you go.😆

Edited by Lilac_N_Maple - 8 years ago

Quote

ponymo

@ponymo

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

Anupama makes an effort not to be biased but ends up being biased a bit, that's exactly why she doesn't review films of her husband, she cannot review them objectively.

Baradwaj Rangan in my opinion is the best critic.

Quote

Sherlock.

@Sherlock.

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: Lilac_N_Maple
Masand is trusted? LOL

He works as PR more often than not.

I would rather believe a Anupama. She is pretty much unbiased despite having her favorites. 😆

Edit: Just checked he gave 3.5 to Sultan too. There you go.😆

Yes 99% of the times Rajeev is trustworthy if u see his track record. Anupama is too liberal and likes almost all the movies IMO.

Sultan 3.5 😕 it is a very good film I heard so 3.5 should be perfect.

Quote

Phosphorus

@Novarieaa

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: shanky1

Yes 99% of the times Rajeev is trustworthy if u see his track record. Anupama is too liberal and likes almost all the movies IMO.

Sultan 3.5 😕 it is a very good film I heard so 3.5 should be perfect.

If unrealistic Sultan seems good to Masand, then ADHM too might be good to him . Who are we to judge his taste?
When he gave PRDP 3 stars, the reasoning was Bhai was the best thing in the movie, considering his limited skills. Umm what kind of reviewer actually cares about somone's acting limitations. From that day onwards I stopped trusting him as much. 😆