Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread-16th September, 2025
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 16, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025: AFG vs BAN, 9th Match, Group B at Abu Dhabi🏏
BHAJAN & DANCE 16.9
Welcome Baby Boy ❤️🧿
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 17, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
YRKKH SM updates, BTS and Spoilers Thread #127
💫 The Heuphorias Discussion Thread 💫
BALH Naya Season BC Voting~BY PM INVITE ONLY~Vote for 2 entries
BACK TO MUSSORIE 17.9
Kajalmaya - sp's new thriller show
Farewell week...In Every Glance, A Lifetime: The Saga of PraShiv💕
War 2 sets record as biggest flop in Indian cinema history
Bipasha Basu and Neha linked to Raj Kundra’s 60 crore fraud case
Is Janhvi Kapoor going to be known as a one-hit wonder?
Abhi-Ash Separation Rumours Is Garbage
Anupamaa 17 Sept 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Originally posted by: bramcote46
So one thread got closed and this thread turned into a hot bed for religious discussions .
For those who conveniently declare themselves to be peaceful is the joke of the century, why be an opportunist and prove yourself to be better , you or your faith is not under attack all the time so you can't really compare , and considering this fact the amount of bakwaas and criminal activities we get to hear by these saffron brigade is a joke , god forbid if there is ever an anti hindu wave for whatever reason then what will these guys do is unimaginable.
Originally posted by: blue-ice
Now this is a big problem...Just because Hinduism is not under attack all the time...the Hindus lose their right to be offended or they lose their rights to protest even in a legal way?...like by suing in the court against what they think is wrong...? I don't understand this mentality...NO ONE IS CONDONING VIOLENCE or ILLEGAL WAYS...but now even peaceful ways and legal use of their rights will also not be allowed??ReallY??
so who attack hinduism ? why it survive till now ? shall we need all the bajdal, rss to save it ?
hello what made u so agitated 😆 legal provision is already is there , still with extra constitutional authority many books pulped aways, few movies banned on the same category recently. Few athiest even murdered recently in maharashtra. Hindu religion itself have part of antagonist, atheism etc. Issue is PK raise some question so we should put red tape on his mouth but the issue is Arjuna himself not only question but have doubt on krishna , may be if we were there we can apply blashphemy law 😆 even those dhobi who question rama we will put traitor law. 😆 forget ram rajya hack even if anyone dare to question current ruller bhaktas punce on them. 😆Chalo whatever may be on movie we are having a more rigid cesor right now then what more u need. Shall we support the extra constitutional authority like who resort to threat to movie property .life etc. 😆
Originally posted by: blue-ice
Now this is a big problem...Just because Hinduism is not under attack all the time...the Hindus lose their right to be offended or they lose their rights to protest even in a legal way?...like by suing in the court against what they think is wrong...? I don't understand this mentality...NO ONE IS CONDONING VIOLENCE or ILLEGAL WAYS...but now even peaceful ways and legal use of their rights will also not be allowed??ReallY??
Originally posted by: bramcote46
So one thread got closed and this thread turned into a hot bed for religious discussions .
For those who conveniently declare themselves to be peaceful is the joke of the century, why be an opportunist and prove yourself to be better , you or your faith is not under attack all the time so you can't really compare , and considering this fact the amount of bakwaas and criminal activities we get to hear by these saffron brigade is a joke , god forbid if there is ever an anti hindu wave for whatever reason then what will these guys do is unimaginable.
Originally posted by: bramcote46
And i said that becoz of that you can't really prove yourself to be more tolerant ( which is a popular trend nowadays) becoz you are not in same position , when did i say that you have no right to be offended or to protest .