Katrina Kaifs real age revealed in the Fevicol Ad

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

RanKat_love

@love_RanKat

Explorer

Posted: 11 years ago

#41

Originally posted by: -IHeartDeepika-
Lmao. She's easily 33-34, older than Bebo and PC. There's no way she was 16 in this ad. More like 21 or 22.

kat's age can be anything but what matters she looks young she even looks younger than deepika. nobody cares what their real age is its not a matter or concern when films are watched by people. she looks younger than deepika and many others that what matters. deepika can be a 5 year old boy liek ranbir says but she looks nothing less than 38-40 yr old man oops woman🤪with that flat manly body its hard to guess if deepika is a man or woman. however sonam debuted same year looks younger than depika *Edited*

Please refrain from comments targeting members.

Edited by -Mmmmm- - 11 years ago

Quote

RanKat_love

@love_RanKat

Explorer

Posted: 11 years ago

#42

Originally posted by: light_year

Even I find deepika 35 . I want to see her passport . Noway she is 28.when katrina was looking like a kid in front of srk . Deepika looks same age like srk . She is no way young.

anushka and katrina look like kids with srk but deepika doesnt because she looks the same age as srk. she looks very aged and matured. look at sonam, anushka and katrina they look very young for their age. deepika fits srk than any other young co-star for her looks and body she is big built very broad shouldered, looks manly and matured. other heroines have delicateness which she lacks she looks like a 40 year old matured person in looks. whats the use of such age when you fail to look your age and look like a buddhi like deepika she looks not a year less than 38😆

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

RanKat_love

@love_RanKat

Explorer

Posted: 11 years ago

#43

Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan

It has nothing to do with the color of her skin or features, she just LOOKS UGLY.

agree deepika is ugly she looks uglier without makeup it has nothing to do with skin color i find many dusky girls very pretty like chitrangada and shilpa who are beautiful.some people please stop this delusional jaap of skin color if someone finds your maata laxmi ugly🥱

Quote

CeaselessBanter

@CeaselessBanter

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

#44

Some people look young through genes, others use science. If they use science, the after should be better than the before not vice versa.

As for Kat, she looks 30+ and if she had plastic surgery it was done by a very good surgeon. Some people in BW would benefit from asking her who.

Quote

Dhee Jattan Di

@DheeJattanDi

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 11 years ago

#45

First of all someone really needs to tell me how this REVEALS her age? People are still busy assuming her actual age here.

There are many people who look older than they actually are. She might have messed up her words in the past, but what matters is the fact that she looks around 30. I know so many 15 year old girls who wear make-up, heels etc. and end up looking older than me.

Quote

shorty123

@shorty123

Voyager

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#46

How do katrina or Anu look like kids next to SRK? Lmao.
They look younger than him but certainly not like kids. Alia or Shraddha would look like kids next to SRK but not Kat or Anu.

The only reason SRK-Kat jodi isn't a hit is because they share zero chemistry. Why do people feel the need to bring DP in this topic??!

Kat looks gorgeous without makeup but she is definitely older than what she says, otherwise she wouldn't feel the need to have botox done.

Quote

Antlers

@Antlers

Sparkler

Posted: 11 years ago

#47

ewww. The bhaji wali looks better than Deepika with no make up.

Quote

butterfly15..

@butterfly15..

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#48

She probably did lie about her age, but I doubt she's the only person to do so, she just got caught out.

And what's with the Deepika vs Katrina competition? I personally don't find Katrina as good looking as everyone says she is, but I do think Deepika is good looking. But honestly which one of us hasn't had a bad picture of us taken? Can we really say we look nice in all of them? Actresses are no different, Deepika and Katrina might not look nice in one, but how can people say that means they aren't good looking? Plus everyone has different tastes.

Also I do believe skin colour plays a huge part in whether someone is deemed good-looking or not. The likes of Katrina, Kareena, Karishma, Aishwarya, Alia are always called beautiful, whereas the more dusky actresses like Deepika, Priyanka, Bipasha etc. are always called sexy but not beautiful. I personally don't care about skin colour, and I'm sure most people on here don't either, but I think it's naive to assume that others don't care about it. Does anyone seriously believe Katrina would be termed as one of the most beautiful Indian women ever if she had darker skin? Same way with Deepika, I believe more people would call her beautiful if she had fair skin.

Quote

d-_-b

@d-_-b

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#49

Yeah she is probably in 30s.

After reading some threads about Family International on Reddit,I am glad Katrina is doing well for herself and is saved from that cult.

Quote

Sharma

@lovanika

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#50

Originally posted by: love_RanKat

kat's age can be anything but what matters she looks young she even looks younger than deepika. nobody cares what their real age is its not a matter or concern when films are watched by people. she looks younger than deepika and many others that what matters. deepika can be a 5 year old boy liek ranbir says but she looks nothing less than 38-40 yr old man oops woman🤪with that flat manly body its hard to guess if deepika is a man or woman. however sonam debuted same year looks younger than depika so shut up keep your katrina hatred frustration yourself. 🥱

🤣 There goes Deepika chant...Deepika is bad..Deepika is thin..Deepika is dark..Deepika looks older...Deepika..Deepika..Deepika...😆