Did SRK or Hrithik do the better AMITABH remake?!! - Page 2

Originally posted by: 2direct

Unlike Don, Agneepath had more scope for a performance but I prefer both the originals, I'm not undermining SRK & Hrithik's performances they were good and did what they could. But they couldn't touch AB's swagger, dialogue delivery or that element of mystique he brought in to his characters IMO.

Originally posted by: breezy

Would give credit to both SRK and HR ... being Honest , AB is over rated actor ... SRK was fab in both 1 and 2 as it had to do with this + in acting , negative shaded role , HR was fab too , he didnot try immitating rather brought back laskhya boy ...

Ditto.

Originally posted by: uk-dhakaboy

hrithik didnt tried 2 touch ab al does body languages so u cnt tell he dat failed to do dat...

hrithik character ws total diff frm da original so comparisons ends dere...>>>

Originally posted by: LaDy_GaGa

I personally didn't like both DON and Agneepath remakes. I think both SRK and Hritik butchered them. Amitji was something else in both movies. First of all these two guyz don't have the Amitabh bachchan's voice and persona to carry off such roles. Original don and original agneepath's dialogues are EPIC.. and the way amitji delivered them was awesome... with SRK and Hritik.. the effect isn't the same.

Originally posted by: Chamkeeli

Having seen both the Agneepath, I believe that Amitabh's character has more style, charisma and suave while Hrithik's character has more emotional touch to it. With Amitji, his persona takes over the character and it becomes larger than life but with Hrithik, you can actually notice that he is playing a character rather than living it...

Originally posted by: bamboocopter

Ditto.

Originally posted by: breezy

Would give credit to both SRK and HR ... being Honest , AB is over rated actor ... SRK was fab in both 1 and 2 as it had to do with this + in acting , negative shaded role , HR was fab too , he didnot try immitating rather brought back laskhya boy ...