Bani was back-bitching again...and again

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

saga_twilight

@saga_twilight

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#31

Who isn't back bitching in the BB house 😆

Quote

cougarTown

@cougarTown

Sparkler

+ 6

Posted: 8 years ago

#32

bani has selected morality per convenience

she was quick to point priyanka how she allowed lopa with her kids despite the fight

but

totally ignored how lopa was so nice to the kids either despite the fight

sab convenience ka khel hai bhai

so please yeh morality ke gyan band karo..

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

namsworld

@namsworld

Navigator

Posted: 8 years ago

#33

Originally posted by: SP2684
Bitching aside, Bani clarified today that she has two sets of standards - for those she likes, and those she doesn't like.

Yesterday she said she didn't 'understand' how the HMs could fight with Jagga, and then be pally with her kids (implying hypocrisy on their parts), and today she expressly stated it, by calling it 'duality'. She says 'HMs' - but she refers to the morning fight - which only included Jagga and Lopa.

So - her thought process:

1.) Jagga puts issues momentarily aside, and allows her kids to mingle with those she had a fight with that morning - Bani 'rates' this, calls Jagga 'big-hearted'.

2.) Lopa and Manu (but particularly Lopa) put their issues with Jagga momentarily aside, and shower affection on Jagga's kids - Bani calls this 'duality'.

Two sets of people, doing exactly the same thing - i.e understanding that your fights do not extend to others - and especially not to children. Yet Bani applauds one, and calls the others two-faced 🤔

Perhaps Bani needs to revisit the definition of 'duality'. It seems, that in attempting to accuse others of it, she's reflected her own.

Very well explained 👏

Quote

astha36

@astha36

Rocker

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

#34

Originally posted by: SP2684
Bitching aside, Bani clarified today that she has two sets of standards - for those she likes, and those she doesn't like.

Yesterday she said she didn't 'understand' how the HMs could fight with Jagga, and then be pally with her kids (implying hypocrisy on their parts), and today she expressly stated it, by calling it 'duality'. She says 'HMs' - but she refers to the morning fight - which only included Jagga and Lopa.

So - her thought process:

1.) Jagga puts issues momentarily aside, and allows her kids to mingle with those she had a fight with that morning - Bani 'rates' this, calls Jagga 'big-hearted'.

2.) Lopa and Manu (but particularly Lopa) put their issues with Jagga momentarily aside, and shower affection on Jagga's kids - Bani calls this 'duality'.

Two sets of people, doing exactly the same thing - i.e understanding that your fights do not extend to others - and especially not to children. Yet Bani applauds one, and calls the others two-faced 🤔

Perhaps Bani needs to revisit the definition of 'duality'. It seems, that in attempting to accuse others of it, she's reflected her own.

Very well said!

There's also this thing that she said Priyanka never fights with me, why should I not talk to her? But when Om had said things about her mom, she wanted everyone to boycott him. Kyun bhai? Usne sirf Bani ki mom ke liye hi toh kaha tha, sabki mom ke liye toh nahi? Fir usse sab kyun boycott karein?

This only proves that she is not objective in her thinking. Different rules for others and different for herself. But who's surprised? 😆

Edited by munnihyderabad - 8 years ago

Quote

Jemimah90

@Jemimah90

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#35

Dear SP2684

Its not duality by the way , ITS HER OPINION WHICH SHE EXPRESSED..

What bani meant to jagga was she is having such a big heart that she is allowing those people to meet her kids especially after what they said to her...

The kids are of jagga , its she who decides whether the kids have to meet the other housemates or not..

This topic was not in context with other housemates.. this topic was in context to jagga..

And she was shocked by the fact that moments before u fought with the person n moments later when her kids came u r playing with her keeping the fights aside.. that part is indigestible to her.,. and some people are like that.. everyone has different perception to the things they see.. not everyone can see from your pov n its not necessary though.

Quote

Jemimah90

@Jemimah90

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#36

Astha36,

Bani reciprocates the same way the person conducts with her.. she was good to pree as pree didn't harm her.. when om said things about her mom , sallu told everyone to boycott him , did anyone followed? Then how can u expect the same from her for boycotting pree.. ? when u cant stand for her then don't expect she will stand for u ..

Both context are different .. here they abused each other.. there he said her mum should die knowing the fact she survived cancer three time.. mum is above all , u cant compare her with any individual at all.. see the gravity of the situation n then speak

Quote

annu_ms

@annu_ms

Navigator

Posted: 8 years ago

#37

Bani should directly get the BB trophy for finding Priyanka super sweet on this planet earth.

Good Nitibha gave her back.

Quote

astha36

@astha36

Rocker

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

#38

Originally posted by: yawfeh
Astha36,

Bani reciprocates the same way the person conducts with her.. she was good to pree as pree didn't harm her.. when om said things about her mom , sallu told everyone to boycott him , did anyone followed? Then how can u expect the same from her for boycotting pree.. ? when u cant stand for her then don't expect she will stand for u ..

Both context are different .. here they abused each other.. there he said her mum should die knowing the fact she survived cancer three time.. mum is above all , u cant compare her with any individual at all.. see the gravity of the situation n then speak

Not only Salman, she too wanted others to react strongly when Om said things about her mom. She expected others to stand in her favour and against Om. Now her point that Priyanka never fought with her and that's why she talks normally to her is not a consistent point from her side. Because Om said things for her mom and not others too at that very time, so expecting others to do one thing in the same situation and doing another thing in that same situation is not being consistent.

Btw no housemate at that time was talking normally to Baba, everybody criticised him openly. So, I think it is not fair to say that nobody stood for her. I don't expect her to make a big scene over what Om or Priyanka said to Lopa. But, clearly them being wrong, she cannot behave normally with them just because they haven't said anything bad about her. That's my point.

Contexts aren't very different. Bani abused Om a lot after what he said. She didn't sit quietly. We don't know if Om knew that her mom survived cancer. Om spoke about her mum and about Lopa's dad. How is the context that different then? The gravity of the situation is the same if not more in this case. He had said something like aapko kasam de raha hun aapki ma ki and agar aap isse todengi toh wo mar jaengi. That's not even as direct as he said about Lopa's dad. So, why don't you analyse the situation again and then speak?